Quantcast
Channel: The Disgruntled Individual
Viewing all 1278 articles
Browse latest View live

Do You Know Where Your Towel Is?

$
0
0


Tomorrow is Towel Day, you frood.

Why not spend the day reading a good book. Donate some money to a rhinoceros. Puzzle over the interconnectedness of all things. And just generally, know where your towel is, in every sense of the phrase.

Serenity May Be Pretty, But She'll Take For Damned Ever

$
0
0
This is a static image. To play the game, head over to Slate.


This might be the best thing I've seen all day. No, all week. Yeah, considering in the past fortnight, I've seen Now You See Me (review to come on Friday), and no new episode of Game of Thrones, this is definitely the best thing I've seen all week. Chris Kirk has put together a fun interactive graphic over on Slate, where you can select the destination, and then science fiction's most prominent ships race to see how long it would take to get there. Go. Go now.

...

Fun, huh? I think the lesson here is, if you intend to travel any significant distance in a reasonable amount of time, either travel instantaneously through the time vortex, or pass through all possible locations in both time and space simultaneously. Otherwise, be patient.

Via Slate.

I Did Not See This Coming

$
0
0


If you had told me, at any point before just now really, that Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch would become a point of heated contention between studios, I would have laughed in your face. Save for the House of M story line a few years back, the sibling pair (incestuous in the Ultimate universe) have been reliable, steady characters for the House of Ideas, but never front line characters. Stable characters in the Avengers roaster, and favourites of cosplayers, and that is about it. As Kevin Feige explained before the release of the Avengers, the rights issues surrounding the two were murky, since as well as being Avengers, they were also the children of Magneto, the X-Men Big Bad. And at the time, FOX and Marvel were sharing rights to the characters, for use on screen. FOX wouldn't be allowed to reference their team membership, and Marvel wouldn't be able to mention their father, or the fact that they are mutants (that concept also being held by FOX).

Last week, Feige and Joss Whedon seemed to settle the question as to who would get to them first by announcing that the pair do appear in Whedon's first draft of the Avengers sequel. While Feige's original comments are unclear, there is a suggestion that which ever company got around to using the characters first got the rights wholly. So, Marvel seemed to win out. Meanwhile, in another universe...

Bryan Singer announced via Twitter that Evan Peters, late of American Horror Story, has been cast as Quicksilver in his already filming X-Men Days of Futures Past. And considering that FOX and Disney are not interested in sharing characters between franchises, there suddenly exists the potential for some brand confusion (I'd like to give people the benefit of the doubt, and understand that a character in one set of films isn't the same as one in another, but then again, people always manage to... what's the negative form of surprise?). What this means for Marvel's plans is not clear. Singer's film is obviously already written, and filming, meaning that they've got something of a leg up on the competition. Whedon is still in first draft mode, and has more then enough time to remove the characters if necessary, or replace them with others (Captain Britain perhaps?). Or, maybe they will go ahead with using the characters in Avengers 2, X-Men be damned. I have to admit, Singer's announcement, days after Marvel's confirmation, seems like a bit of a dick move.

That being said, I'd rather see the pair in an X-Men film then an Avengers film. Anything Whedon would do would have to avoid or ignore the fact that the characters are mutants, a fundamental aspect to the characters. In fact, the whole reason they are on the Avengers is because they so powerfully disagree with their father's point of view and tactics, they joined up with a team that fights against him. To include them would essentially force them to become entirely different characters, and if that's the case, what's the point? There are hundreds of characters to choose from that Marvel has the rights to, why bastardise a couple for the sake of (some pretty low) name recognition? By including them in the X-Men films, they preserve the fundamental aspects of the characters, and still afford them the ability to resist their father by joining up with Xavier's crew. Potentially, the X-Men versions will be truer forms of the characters, rather then just in-name-only copies with all the substance ripped out. Not that Whedon would want to do that, but he'd pretty much have to.

Beyond this new development, one can assume that in the next days or weeks, we'll see an announcement of who will be playing the Scarlet Witch for Singer's film. And possibly a comment for Feige as to how Marvel intends to react to this development.

Via Collider.

Doctor Who Prequel Short Arrives A Week Late

$
0
0


Shorts like this reassure me that Moffat hasn't lost it entirely as a writer. This prequel to The Name of the Doctor (really, isn't it just an exorcised scene that didn't have a place in the actual episode) is dark, moody, full of atmosphere, and a perfect demonstration of how the Whispermen could have been used, and a sore reminder of how useless they were in the episode. Of course, it gets bogged down with a touch of technobabble in the middle, but that's rather par for the course at this point, isn't it.

What the scene does do is explain how Clarence knew the coordinates of Trenzalore, the only question from the series finale that I wasn't that hung up on knowing.

Via Den of Geek.

[Review] - Continuum, Season 2 Episode 5, "Second Opinion"

$
0
0
Courtesy of Reunion Pictures

The last couple episodes have been building towards a confrontation. Not between Liber8 and the police, those happen nearly every week. The confrontation was between Kiera and herself. The growing sense of dread, of inevitability, of hopelessness towards the failure of her primary mission to this point: getting home. And it should be made clear, that is all Kiera has really been working towards. Stopping Liber8 has been little more then a combination of duty and a means to an end, with Liber8 still representing her best chance at returning to her family. But as the second season has worn on, the evidence is falling more and more in favour of Kiera being stuck in the present. And her unwillingness to accept that truth has been making her unstable.

And in this episode, it came to a head.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that shoot lights when you squeeze their tummy.

This episode was what folk in the industry call a bottle episode. It took place almost exclusively in the police station, used few unestablished sets, or in the case of Alec's new server room, sets that will (presumably) be used frequently moving forward. Bottle episodes are budget savers, those shunted into seasons that keep the guest stars and location shoots to a minimum and the costs down. And the sort of thing they can shoot quickly and without fuss. And in terms of tapestry, this episode was without fuss. Minimal CGI, only a couple new characters, and save one brief scene, no Liber8.

I've long been a fan of bottle episodes, as they usually focus the most on the characters, rather then the action. And that's exactly what this one did, in as traditional a manner as you can get: interrogation. Be it a therapy session, deposition or police interview, the one-on-one examination of motivations is a quick and easy way to get to the heart of a character. Aaron Sorkin loves using the device to burrow in deep. Here, the accepting Dillon is ousted, taking the blame for Travis' escape episodes ago, and a new boss is brought in. First order of business: finding the suspected leak in the department. And trying to figure out exactly who Kiera really is.

The episode was an opportunity for Rachel Nichols to really impress us, and boy did she. This episode expected everything of her, and she delivered every time. Running from Hulk-rage to smug satisfaction to emotionally crippled breakdown, she was taken to her emotional breaking point here, and over. My favourite moment, possible of the season, was her breathless exclamation, while waving a paper towel in the air, that "they still use these things to dry their hands." A short line, but an excellent way to pair down all of Kiera' experiences and current situation. And Nichols nailed the delivery. It also introduced Battlestar's Alessandro Juliani as the therapist, who by the end of the episode was an unexpected ally of Kiera's, and a character I wouldn't be adverse to seeing again, under less antagonist circumstances.

The plot was another intriguing look into the future society, as her emotional instability on her son's birthday triggered the emergence of an AI therapist, who immediately cuts off contact with Alec, and insisted she come to terms with the cause of her trauma, or it would delete the offending memories. On the surface, this seems like a logical system to have: consider how much easier it would be for an officer to over come PTSD after a fatal shooting if the memories of that shooting could simply be erased. However, it also highlights to horror of the implications of that sort of black-and-white methodology.

I was discussing the potential effects of the singularity with someone the other day, and I mentioned this very issue. Were our minds connected to computers, my primary concern wouldn't be with other people potentially hacking my systems and controlling me (a plot Continuum covered in the first season). My concern would be with the technology exercising undo influence over me, and interpreting it's programing in new and unexpected ways. So, the simple directive to wipe offending memories poses a grave threat to Kiera, since the offending memories are of her family, her time, and everything she has experienced since arriving in the present, essentailly leaving her a blank slate. A terrifying prospect. One that forces Kiera to finally come to terms with what she has been avoiding for weeks now, that in all likelihood, she will never get home.

She's been living in two times the past season and a half, her body in the present, her mind in the future. Her refusal to live completely in the now has caused her no end of grief, and prevented her from properly establishing a life and meaningful relationships here. Even her relationship with Alec is predicated on his usefulness to her. He is a tool in her belt, though we've seen hints of a more sibling-like connection between them. What I'm excited about is, now that she seemingly has moved beyond the trauma of being sent back, and has accepted her time and place, how that will translate into her behaviour. Will she open up even further? Will she assimilate fully in the modern society? Or will she never be able to truly let go? Because Jason couldn't, and he became a raving hobo.

The episode also confirmed what I had correctly predicted back when the prospect of a leak was brought up. Not that Gardiner is a dick, we knew that already. Though his dickishness was on full display here (and what implications will his identification of Alec on the phone have down the line?). But rather the confirmation that Betty is the mole. I reasoned that she was the logical choice, having been present throughout the series, but not a major player, thus someone the viewer would have an emotional reaction to. The questions now begin to roll in: when was she turned to Liber8's side? How long has she been moling for them? What is she getting out of the arrangement? Is it mutual, or are they forcing her to act this way? I have to give credit to the show, even though I saw this reveal coming weeks ago, Kiera's speech about the obvious choice being a distraction was enough to have me convinced for a couple minutes that I was wrong, and that Betty wasn't the mole. They Kansas City Shuffled me with only one character. And that is impressive.

We're pretty much at the mid way point this season, and a lot has been shaken up. Now that Kiera is stable, we can look elsewhere, to see how other things will play out. Is Dillon gone for good, and if so, what does this mean for the comfort and leeway Kiera has received up to this point? Especially now with a new SO who is openly suspicious of Kiera? What is Kellog, seen ominously lurking behind Alec in command central, really up to? Has his moral ambiguity up to this point really been just a smoke screen for foul purposes, and if so, what part does he expect Alec to play?

Next week, former Headstones front man and Flashpoint star Hugh Dillon guest stars. Looking forward to that.

No No No! I Refuse To Accept This Will Suck

$
0
0


Walking With Dinosaurs: The Movie has the potential to be one of the better dinosaur movies ever made, by virtue of being a dinosaur movie, not a movie with dinosaurs in it. With the volume muted, it appears to have been filmed like a narrative-structured nature documentary. And in the international trailer, which was far better then this American one, that was the case. It had a terrible voice over, but compared to his one, it was Casablanca.

This trailer uses the narrator as the internal monologue of the dino (identified as Pachyrhinosaurus), and decreases my interest in this film significantly. I want the actions of the animals to speak for themselves, though I would begrudgingly accept a voice over narration, like Kenneth Branagh's from the original mini series. But I will not accept a Homeward Bound-style anthropomorphising of these animals for the sake of American comfort. This is a science film, dammit, not a Disney picture!

I can easily see the studio releasing two versions of the film: one where the world the filmmakers have created speaks for itself, to be released internationally. And another, with kid friendly "gods forbid the audience shouldn't have to be spoon fed anything, lets dilute any sense of scientific validity the film might have for the sake of the box office, dinosaurs are kids stuff and it's just a cartoon why shouldn't it have goofy voice overs" version for North America. And if you take offence to that, let me remind you that Pirates: In An Adventure With Scientists was changed to Band of Misfits in the US and Australia, and British voices were redubbed with American voices, expressly for those reasons.

And that makes me so sad and angry I think I need to lie down. Fox, you are officially on notice: don't ruin this movie trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator.

Well, That Explains Some Things

$
0
0

Anyone who has seen Star Trek Into Darkness by now knows that about half way through there is a reveal, which I personally don't consider a spoiler, but which I will put after the jump for those that might, and if you haven't seen the film, maybe you should stop reading this now. And that reveal, for many people is a major issue of complaint against the film (it certainly was for me). Kurtzman and Orci, two of the films three writers, did an interview for Yahoo, and said some things that I think help to explain why the film wasn't as good as it might have been.

Hit the jump for their comments, which contains spoilers for Into Darkness.

In my review of the film, I said that if Benedict Cumberbatch had never been revealed as Khan, but had remained John Harrison all the way through, the structure of the character's arc wouldn't have changed at all, and possibly might have made the film better because of it (it certainly would have made all the ripping off of Wrath of Khan in the third act unnecessary). At least it would have meant that we got an original villain rather then a rehash.

So, in the interview with Yahoo, after confusing the names of the Vulcan and Klingon home worlds (one of which they destroyed last time around), Orci said this (emphasis mine):
"Once we had that standalone story, we wondered: are there details from Khan's history that fit? We returned to our Easter eggs at the back of the fridge: there were those seventy-two torpedoes that happened to house his crew. If we can use the details of Khan's backstory given our structure to make the movie more specific and more relevant, then that works."

Kurtzman followed that up with:
"Only when we decided that Khan really does fit here - and the fans know that Khan is to the series what The Joker is to "Batman" - that's when we decided we earned it"
To me this explains why Harrison's story seemed complete, and the addition of Khan seemed tacked on: because it was. That they had the story in place, and shunted Khan in afterwards, under the misunderstanding that fans wanted Khan (caving to fan demands never works), makes sense. Using Khan to fill in the gaps, and then use that as an excuse to phone in the final third of the script, is lazy and disappointing, but at least it means they didn't come at the script with the intention of using Khan and raping the best of the Trek films for all it's best material from the start. They did begin by writing an original piece, then they let hubris and avarice corrupt it into it's final form, using the fan as their excuse.

What really illustrates the film's flaws for me is the second quote: the fundamental misunderstanding of the character, and the relationship he has with the franchise. And they once again try to blame the fans. I think fans know that Khan isn't the Joker of the Trek universe. I think fans know that if anyone is the Joker its the Borg, in their endless returning from certain doom, constant dogging of the franchise, being diminished in effectiveness with every specific detail that is revealed about them, and never left alone long enough for their absence to be felt. Fans understand that Khan appearing in only a single episode and a single film, with very specific goals and motivations both times, does not make him the mortal enemy to the entire universe. Fans understand that Trek doesn't need that kind of enemy, and has never needed that kind of enemy. If it did, why have there never been recurring Klingon generals to plague Kirk? DS9 had their own recurring baddies, but DS9 was structured differently then anything that had come before or since. Fans don't expect Khan to be in every film, because they understand his effectiveness was his uniqueness and his economy. This isn't the fans mistake, this is theirs, and that they seem intent on shifting that blame onto us is yet another reason they shouldn't be invited back.

That, and Lindelof's suggestion of bringing Khan back for yet another film. That would be a terrible decision.

Via The Mary Sue.

Jon Stewart Adds A Cast To His Film

$
0
0
From Iran Human Rights

A couple months ago, it was announced that Jon Stewart would be taking a break form the Daily Show to direct a film he wrote, called Rosewater, based on the experiences of journalist Maziar Bahari at the hands of the Iranians, and through which the Daily Show was accidentally involved. Stewart hasn't mentioned the project much on the programme, save Bill O'Reilly's insistence that Stewart had been fired, and the revelation that J.J. Abrams gave Stewart advice while he was writing the script.

In fact, short of the announcement of the project, there hasn't been much additional information revealed. They have just now announced who will be playing Bahari, Mexican actor Gael Garcia Bernal, perhaps best known for his lead role in The Motorcycle Diaries. No further cast has been announced, but it will be interesting to see if Stewart embraces or resists casting many of his talented (largely comedic) acting friends, such as Denis Leary, who have proven themselves readily capable of dramatic work. Certainly through his decade+ hosting the number one show on Comedy Central, he has cultivated a base of actors who no doubt would be willing to work with him. One assumes Jason Jones will at least be putting in an appearance as himself, to recreate the segments that were used against Bahari.

John Oliver will take over hosting duties starting June 10th, until September 3rd.

Via /Film.

Season 2 Of The Newsroom Promises Even More Sitting And Talking

$
0
0


The second season of Aaron Sorkin's the Newsroom premiers on July 14th, and we still haven't gotten a good look at it. HBO has released a behind the scenes look at the second season, describing what the format this year will be, but no clips from the actual episodes are included. And no sign of Patton Oswalt.

The deposition is one of Sorkin's favourite narrative devices, and they have resulted in some of the best episodes of his various series (West Wing's season two Noel comes to mind) but he has never used it on this scale before, structuring an entire season around the testimonies given by characters, and presumably flashing back within those episodes to the events being described. Certainly has a lot of potential for commentary from characters, in a self referential, breaking the fourth wall kind of way.

Via Collider.

Joss Whedon's Message To The Future: "You're All Going To Die"

$
0
0

Joss Whedon is a man of many hats. He directed the most successful film of last year, he actively routes for the zombie apocalypse, and occasionally teaches people how to poop. And on Saturday, at Wesleyan University, during his commencement address, he proved that he can make a more lasting impact on the minds of a group of kids who really want to take off their robes and drink, then Bill Cosby.

The speech is good. Not as good as Neil Gaiman's, but good. I preferred the start of the speech, when it was much more off the cuff and affable, as that is when Whedon tends to be at his best when speaking. But it's certainly the best geek idol giving a speech to youths we've had this year. 

My favourite thing about this speech: how much the guy sitting behind Whedon on his right is absolutely loving every word of it.

Via Uproxx.

PBS Thinks You're Dumb, And They Are Probably Right

$
0
0


Have I detailed my redefined terms for Reality television programs before? Probably, but I'll go over them again.

I hate Reality TV. I hate every example of it, and I especially hate the term. And despite signs that after a decade and a half of having a strangle hold over the American networks, Reality TV is finally in a decline, I think we're in need of narrower terms for this colossus of crap that has ravaged the television landscape. "Reality" gets gone, and is replaced by three separate terms. First, Game Shows. Lump any "reality" show with a competitive component into the same category as Price Is Right and Match Game. So, all those singing shows where there is a final winner, any of those racing shows, or design and reno shows, or anytime somebody has to eat something gross to move on to the next round, those are Game Shows.

The next two can run into each other, but I believe clear distinctions can be made. Documentary TV: any of the shows like Cops or Dirty Jobs or Deadliest Catch. The programs that follow people doing a job, where the job is more the focus then the people. They get lumped into the same category as David Attenborough and David Suzuki. Finally, and these ones are the problem ones, what I call Vanity TV. The Kardashians. The Real House Wives. Judge Judy. The vapid, desperate whoring of ones self and whatever dignity they've got left to pretend their lives are interesting for cameras, so that sad people with empty lives can live vicariously through a fiction dressed up as real life for 22 minutes at a time. Also included in this category would be Duck Dynasty, and any of those shows that are designed to make the stars famous rather then illuminate a function or fulfil a purpose.

New York's PBS Thirteen has taken out some brilliant subway billboards, effectively belittling the viewing public for watching and accepting such crap. It is an effective example of public shaming, not entirely original (since every internet comedy troupe has done down a fake Reality TV spoof since the invention of YouTube), but man are they effective. And a reminder of exactly what networks and the cable stations are actively putting on TV, that these examples don't seem outlandish in any way. I remember in 2003 when FOX announcedMan vs Beast, wherein 50 little persons would compete in a pulling contest against an elephant, and everything though "this has gone too far, this is the bottom of the barrel." Ten years later, and all we've learned is how much barrel there was left.

See four other examples from Thirteen's campaign after the jump.


 
 


Probably my favourite.

Via Uproxx.

Pixar Prepares For The Future

$
0
0


Disney and it's subsidiaries aren't ones for sitting on their laurels. LucasFilm, or whatever it'll be known as under the Disney umbrella, have already announced they'll drive the Star Wars franchise into the ground with a new film every year. Marvel has secured it's releases up til the fall of 2016. And now Pixar has gotten in the game, by announcing all intended release dates for films up to 2018.

Mark the calendar folk, because past this year's Monsters University on June 21st, Pixar will release The Good Dinosaur on May 30, 2014, Inside Out on June 15, 2015, the Finding Nemo sequel Finding Dory on November 25, 2015, and the untitled Día de los Muertos film from Lee Unkrich on June 17, 2016. Beyond that, films that the studio hasn't started making yet will be released on June 16, 2017, November 22, 2017 and June 15, 2018. At the beginning of the month, Disney CEO Bob Iger suggested that more sequels might be coming from the studio, and despite no announcements from Pixar, that double date in 2017 might be a good place to plant a potential uncertainty, especially if Monsters University and Finding Dory perform at the level of Cars 2 rather then Toy Story 3. Brad Bird has confirmed that, once he's finished with Tommorrowland, he might be willing to look at returning to the The Incredibles, the only Pixar film in my mind whose plot, rather then characters, is cohesive to sequelizing.

Disney themselves also locked up the dates March 4, 2016,  November 23, 2016, March 9, 2018 and November 21, 2018, note worthy for three reasons. One, Disney is stepping aside in favour of Pixar for the entirety of 2017. Second, unlike Pixar's five announced projects, Disney only has three confirmed films in the works, and two of them, Planes on August 9, and Frozen on November 27, come out this year. The third, Big Hero 6, a joint film made with Marvel, based on a Japanese based super hero group from the comics, will be released on November 7, 2014. Third, none of Disney's projects, announced or otherwise, for at least the next decade, will be done in traditional hand drawn animation, which is stupid.

Wouldn't it be great if, considering Pixar is directly responsible for the industry wide shift away from hand drawn stuff, if they announced an entirely hand drawn feature? I'd love and respect them all the more for that.

Via /Film.

Guardians Of The Galaxy Is Getting Pretty Interesting

$
0
0


I don't, as a habit, like reporting on casting news, because until the movie is actually being filmed (and occasionally not even then) a cast isn't certain. Sometime though, it's hard not to get excited. Like when it has been suggested over the last couple days that Marvel has cast Glenn Close and John C. Reilly in James Gunn's Guardians of the Galaxy.

Reilly is apparently wanted for the role of Rhomman Dey, who would act as an intermediary between the Guardians and either Earth or the Nova Corps (described as a Coulson-like character). It's more likely the latter organisation, since Close has been cast as the head of the Nova Corps, essentially a Nick Fury role. What's exciting isn't so much the casting, which is exciting in it's own right, it's that Marvel might be establishing a ground work for a whole second tier of films, much more so then we previously thought. While Marvel has less space based characters and books then DC, there are still many aliens species, and many characters (first and foremost, Captain Marvel, be it the Danvers or Mar-Vell versions) that operate in space, and largely separate from Earth. The establishment of the Nova Corps might be an indication that, come Phase 3, Marvel is looking to expand deeper into the universe of the Marvel... um, universe. A connective thread through which several films can be drawn, much like SHIELD was used on Earth in Phase 1.

Marvel is also apparently looking at actors like Hugh Laurie, Alan Rickman and Ken Watanabe to fill out additional Nova Corp roles (not surprisingly, considering Gunn's history, much of the cast are known for their comedic abilities). Still no word on the casting of Rocket Raccoon and Gort the Space-Ent, though I find it hard to believe those roles haven't been cast. Marvel is obviously saving the announcement for greatest effect. Maybe at Comiccon this summer.

Via Collider, and again.

[Review] - Now You See Me

$
0
0
Courtesy of Summit Entertainment
If there is one plot device that hooks me every time, it's time travel. If there is a second, it's illusionists. I have endless respect for such dedicated people, and how they perform their art. Few things lull me deeper into a state of contentment then watching a skilled magician perform a card trick. So, when the topic makes it's way to film, I pay attention, to see how they approach the stories of the lives of the sort of people who lie, cheat and steal their way to fame, playing on the hopes of the public that somehow, magic exists.

Now You See Me wants, or thinks, it's Ocean's Eleven, or The Prestige. It thinks it is incredibly clever idea, wrapped in a very stylish package, misdirecting you from the big reveal by flashing talent and humour in our faces. "The closer you look," the movie thinks it endlessly repeats (but only actually says three or four times), "the less you see." Unfortunately, what the movie really is, is quite a lot of smug bluster and wasted ability on a script that has delusions of grandeur.

Hit the jump for the review, which has made all the spoilers disappear.


You might be surprised to learn, based on the extensive amount of advertising being done for this film, that Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson and Isla Fisher are not the stars of the film. You might be surprised to learn that Dave Franco is in it at all, as he has been the focus of exactly none of that advertising. And to be fair, when your film has Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman and Mark Ruffalo in it, that the younger Franco and French actress Melanie Laurent get pushed to the edge might be expected. But getting back to the original point, the three actors being focused on are secondary, appearing only when action needs to be precipitated, and then disappearing until needed again. The stars of this picture are Ruffalo and Laurent, because this isn't a movie about magic, or illusionists. Which is good, because the movie fails at convincing you that any illusions are happening, thanks to copious and obvious amounts of CG. This is a heist film, a cops and robbers movie where the robbers are Copperfields and Jillettes rather then Capones or Barrows. 

Ruffalo plays a beleaguered and sceptical FBI agent (the Scully); Laurent, an onloan INTERPOL agent who wants to believe, not in magic, but in the humanity that lets people believe in magic (the Mulder). They are paired up to investigate the apparent robbery of a Parisian bank during the magic act of the Four Horsemen (Eisenberg, Harrelson, Fisher, Franco). The investigation causes them to cross paths with the Horsemen's financial baker, Arthur Tressler played by Caine, and professional illusionist debunker and smug wet blanket Thaddeus Bradley, played by Freeman. The man hunt takes them across the country, from Vegas, to a Mardi Gras set piece, to New York City. And all along the way, you can practical hear the check boxes being marked off a list of how to make as inoffensive, by-the-book cliched action movie under the guise of intellectual film making.

The film, written by Ed Solomon (Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure), Boaz Yakin (Remember the Titans), and Edward Ricourt never rises above it's own smug assumption that it is as smart and as original as it thinks it is. That, by attempting to be clever, that somehow imbues it with cleverness. And in the early minutes of the film, it almost seems like it will live up to it. The cold open, when a mysterious figure (who will also disappear from the film and your mind until the very end) stalks each of the horsemen, is very well done. Well written, shot and paced. Each Horseman displays his or her talents in their native environment (Eisenberg using magic to score dates; Harrelson using his hypnosis to blackmail tourists). These talents are all but ignored or abadoned past these establishing moments. The mystery man brings them together for foul purposes unknown. However, once the film jumps forward a year, during which the team prepare for their "big show," it looses the magic in favour of action like high speed car chases, and parkour fight scenes.

Burying the Horsemen in the background wouldn't have been that noticeable if not for the fact that Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg are two of the film's biggest assets, and the scant few scenes of them bickering amongst each other glimpse at a better film that could have been, focusing on them being forced to work together. The chemistry between them that elevated Zombieland from just another zombie comedy into something more is well on display, and could have elevated this lack of material into something more memorable. Sadly, all the taste gives you is wanting more, and an empty feeling when no more materialises. Throughout the film, there is a sense that there is more movie sitting somewhere. The interactions between the Horsemen, including plenty of backstory that never gets explored, and plenty of potential for building relationships, is ignored. I'm still at a loss as to what purpose Isla Fisher plays at all. Presumably, based on a briefly glimpsed photograph at one point in the film, there is an entire sub-plot starring Elias Koteas that is sitting on a editing bay floor somewhere, because he's no where to be seen in the final print. The back and forth of the interrogation sequence in particular is an island of hilarity in an otherwise joyless exercise. And it's all down to Harrelson and Eisenberg nailing those scenes.

As wasted as the Horsemen are in their roles, most everyone else has clearly been cast for star power alone. Caine and Freeman have nothing to do except put in an appearence, though Freeman slightly less nothing (his ever present assistant gets exactly one line), acting as Mr. Exposition in that voice of his, walking the audience through the "difficult bits." Caine shows up, gets little to do (his ever present assistant gets no lines), and disappears. So maybe the movie was magic after all. For me, the highlight of the film was Laurent, and I could have stood for the script to examine her more in depth. Sadly, she is just as underutilised as the rest, and because she's not a name, will go underappreciated for what she does deliver.

The movie feels like a discarded Leverage script, ramped up to eleven, and then filmed with epileptic camera movements (seriously, it is as if Louis Leterrier, of the Clash of the Titans remake and Incredible Hulk, filmed the movie with the camera mounted on a Lazy Susan), and all the sense drained out of the jumps in logic. Like most films of this genre, which are built around twist after twist, the film tries to out do itself. And each time, the sequence is harder to follow, harder to swallow, and makes generally less sense (some films actually give the audience enough information to figure it for themselves as they go. This film just dumps new information on us the scene before it is relevant). The big twist, meant to accompany an "aw ha" moment, as previous sequences are revisited from a different perspective, lands with a dull thud. In the audience I saw it with, a confused and audible silence swept the room, as everyone tried to figure out how it made any sense at all (it doesn't). But what's worse is that most of the overly complicated explanations are unnecessary, as the tricks themselves are obvious (a dead character not being dead, and so forth). Because we've seem them all, in arrangements just like, a half a hundred times in frankly better movies.

The film delivers it's lack of anything substantive in terms of plot or character development in a very stylish, very loud way. The colours are loud, every shot is crisp and pressed and looks as good as a fresh hundred dollar bill. And were this a movie like Fast and the Furious, which you expect to be an empty shell of a film, that would work. But the film tries to hard to look good, and all it ends up being is a chimp in a designer suit. Which also would have made for a better twist ending then what we got. What it is a blatant attempt to sell a mindless action film under the pretence of a thought-provoking caper. One of those summer not-busters that will be forgotten after it leaves theatres, is pushed to the discount bin at Walmart, and a constant "what was that movie" on every one of these actor's resumes. 

I'm fairly certain Morgan Freeman has already forgotten he appeared in it.

Nathan Fillion Is An Ass

$
0
0


I would not have expected that the movie I'm most looking forward to this year would be a black and white, shoestring modernised adaptation of a Shakespeare play, yet here we are. Either, it says something about how I've matured over the years as a cinephile, or it says something about the other movies set for release this year. Either I'm getting better, or they're getting worse. Both options frighten me.

The marketing push begins on Joss Whedon's Much Ado About Nothing, set for release in the next few weeks, depending on the market. And smartly, they've begun by highlighting probably the most widely known of the cast members, and certainly the most accessible and affluent, Nathan Fillion. Being called an ass. And reacting as you might expect.

Reminder: Patrick Stewart Is Awesome

$
0
0


Patrick Stewart tweeted this image earlier this week, and something about it confuses me. Not that a 72 year old man-of-the-world like Patrick Stewart has never eaten a slice of pizza (turns out, it was only the first time he had ordered an individual slice, not the first time he had eaten pizza), that can be understandable. I mean, I'm sure there are many things that Patrick Stewart has eaten that have never crossed my lips. Nor is it that Patrick Stewart is 72 and only just appears to have entered his fifties (it helps that he looks like he's been in his fifties since the 1970's). The man will outlive us all, at this rate. No, what fluxes me about this image, taken in New York City, is the Montreal Canadiens hat the former starship captain is wearing.

Is he a fan of hockey? And if so, why the Canadiens? My Ottawa Senators dollythumped their hind quarters in the first round of the playoffs this year (before getting well and properly dollythumped themselves by Pittsburgh). But why, of all teams, is Professor X supporting the Habs?

What isn't up for dispute is that Stewart is awesome, as is evidenced by this off the top of his head speech he gave at the Dallas Comicpalooza 2013, about violence against women and the effects of PTSD on returning combat troops. The video of this speech is provided after the jump.



Touching and humbling and and fantastic. All of it.

But the Habs? Really?

Via Uproxx, twice.

Make It An Even Dozen Then

$
0
0

Matt Smith has announced that he will be leaving Doctor Who after the 2013 Christmas special. No point in burying that lead. And honestly, it can't be said that it hasn't been expected. While Steven Moffat and new companion Jenna Louis Coleman have been confirmed for series 8 for some time, any lack of news on Smith's part has caused speculation that Smith's tenure as the Time Lord might be drawing to a close. This confirms those speculations. Smith released the following statement:
"Doctor Who has been the most brilliant experience for me as an actor and a bloke, and that largely is down to the cast, crew and fans of the show.  I'm incredibly grateful to all the cast and crew who work tirelessly every day, to realise all the elements of the show and deliver Doctor Who to the audience.  Many of them have become good friends and I'm incredibly proud of what we have achieved over the last four years.

Having Steven Moffat as show runner write such varied, funny, mind bending and brilliant scripts has been one of the greatest and most rewarding challenges of my career.  It's been a privilege and a treat to work with Steven, he's a good friend and will continue to shape a brilliant world for the Doctor.

The fans of Doctor Who around the world are unlike any other; they dress up, shout louder, know more about the history of the show (and speculate more about the future of the show) in a way that I've never seen before, your dedication is truly remarkable.  Thank you so very much for supporting my incarnation of  the Time Lord, number Eleven, who I might add is not done yet, I'm back for the 50th anniversary and the Christmas special!

It's been an honour to play this part, to follow the legacy of brilliant actors, and helm the TARDIS for a spell with 'the ginger, the nose and the impossible one'. But when ya gotta go, ya gotta go and Trenzalore calls. Thank you guys.  Matt."
For whatever faults the series might have had of late, you can't claim that Smith was one of them. His performances saved many an episode, and he was a fantastic addition to the slim collection of actors to have played the role. Certainly, he's one of the more appreciative of the opportunity. His total, at time of departure, will be three complete series (it also means, rather sadly, that his last full series will be the one that just concluded, arguably one of it's weakest), as well as the 50th special and the next Christmas special, which will technically be part of series 8. That puts him in line with 10th David Tennant (three series, plus a series of specials), 2nd Patrick Troughton (whose portrayal inspired Smith the most), 5th Peter Davison (whose portrayal inspired Tennant), and 7th Sylvester McCoy (who was cancelled). So, despite calls that Smith might have been the actor to test Tom Baker's record, his time on the programme turned out to be perfectly average.

After the jump, see what Steven Moffat had to say concerning Smith's departure.


Moffat said this regarding Smith:
"Every day, on every episode, in every set of rushes, Matt Smith surprised me: the way he'd turn a line, or spin on his heels, or make something funny, or out of nowhere make me cry, I just never knew what was coming next. The Doctor can be clown and hero, often at the same time, and Matt rose to both challenges magnificently. And even better than that, given the pressures of this extraordinary show, he is one of the nicest and hardest-working people I have ever had the privilege of knowing. Whatever we threw at him - sometimes literally - his behaviour was always worthy of the Doctor.

But great actors always know when it's time for the curtain call, so this Christmas prepare for your hearts to break, as we say goodbye to number Eleven. Thank you Matt - bow ties were never cooler.

Of course, this isn't the end of the story, because now the search begins. Somewhere out there right now - all unknowing, just going about their business - is someone who's about to become the Doctor. A life is going to change, and Doctor Who will be born all over again! After 50 years, that's still so exciting!"
Moffat will now have the privilege of having been able to write for four(!) separate Doctors, and to have created two himself. I hope he understands the responsibility inherent in that.

And now the speculation can begin anew. Expect article after article to spring up on the internet, and undoubtedly this very site, between now and November (when the BBC would be most likely to make an announcement, amongst the 50th celebrations) as to who might take on the role of the Dozenth Doctor (which will be how I refer to him from now on).

And Moffat has it right. 50 years, and twelve actors later, and it's all still very exciting.

Via the BBC.

Karen Gillan Just Can't Escape Space

$
0
0

In other former Doctor Who actor news, former companion and fan favourite Karen Gillan has landed her first big post-Who role. And she's hitching her britches to the growing Marvel band wagon (not a bad move, career wise, that). According to reports, Gillan will play the as of yet unspecified primary villain in James Gunn's Guardians of the Galaxy. This comes days after the announcement of John C. Reilly and Glenn Close being added to the picture.

The careers of former companions after they leave the TARDIS is a mixed bag. Some can never escape the popularity of their characters. Others don't even try. And fan adoration does not guarantee further success. The best example of success after Who are those who go in entirely different directions, moving away from the genre or similar roles (Billie Piper in Diary of a Call Girl, Freema Agyeman in Law and Order UK). Gillan's first announced post-Who film didn't sound spectacular, and working with Marvel is certainly a step in the right direction for anyone. It will be interesting to see if remaining in science fiction, but taking on a antagonistic role is successful for Gillan.

What is most interesting about this announcement is that she will be playing the primary villain. Not the villain's love interest, or devoted follower. That she'll be playing the primary baddie, which will also be the first female villain in a Marvel film, a move in the right direction in terms of use of Marvel's many female characters [update: sources are conflicted in if she'll be playing the primary antagonist, or the primary female antagonist. Until we know for certain, I'm sticking with my interpretation] I think we can assume Gillan won't be playing Thanos, so it also opens up exactly who the Guardians will be fighting against, and who Lee Pace's previously announced villainous role will be in relation to her.

Via Den of Geek.

No Mr. Bond, I Expect You To Thrive

$
0
0


Sam Mendes left some pretty big shoes to fill. Skyfall is, if not the best Bond film ever made, then easily the second. It was reverent to the entire series without winking at itself, it was a tight, emotional story, and it was a good movie, even if it hadn't been about Bond. To follow that up with Bond 24 is not an enviable task. So unenviable, that the producers have signed Sam Mendes to follow himself up.

And I'm one of those who, until I see the finished product, will be wary at this. I'm not a fan of creative teams returning to franchise projects. For original projects, it pretty much has to be the same team every time (no one else could have directed the Back to the Future or Indiana Jones sequels then Zemeckis and Spielberg respectively). But for franchises that don't hinge on a specific creative direction, where the goal is fresh interpretation of the characters, repeating the creative teams (and I include writers in that as well as directors) tends only to lead to stagnation. They either try to replicate exactly what made their first attempt successful, resulting in a flaccid copy. Or, they try to one up themselves, leading to something overblown and empty.

We've seen it many times before. Recently, in fact, with J.J. Abrams and Star Trek Into Darkness. Or Jon Favreau on the Iron Man films. Or within the Bond franchise itself, with Lewis Gilbert's the Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker, or John Glen with all of the 1980 Bonds. I have been vocal in my applauding of Marvel hiring new creative teams for every one of their films, and why I will be no where near as excited about Avengers 2 as I was Avengers because of Whedon's return to the director chair (I remain optimistic because Whedon himself seems very aware of this principle, and I maintain Whedon is the only writer/director capable of balancing so many characters).

Martin Campbell managed to avoid falling into this trap when he did GoldenEye and Casino Royale, and I put that down to having a decade pass between his involvement, and Craig's Bond being a fundamentally different character then Brosnan's. So, despite the quality of Mendes' work on Skyfall, I feel like is return to this universe should wait for another few films. Of course, he could surprise me; he clearly impressed the Bond producers, who have reportedly also signed him on to Bond 25, making him the first director since Glen to direct three Bond's in a row.

The producers meanwhile, are wasting no time getting ready for the film (no word on if they've even got a script yet), with the rumour appearing that Penelope Cruz has been hired as the Bond Girl. This is in no way confirmed, but Cruz is a whale they've been trying to catch for some time, and a fantastic choice for an exotic beauty to match wits with Craig's Bond, if they have signed her on. She would be joining Craig and the presumptive returning cast of Ralph Finnes, Ben Whishaw, and Naomie Harris. If the movie manages to film next year as expected, the release date could fall anywhere between 2015 and 2016.

Via Collider. Twice.

[Review] - Continuum, Season 2 Episode 6, "Second Truths"

$
0
0
Courtesy of Reunion Pictures
Considering that this episode hit two massive reveals, one that the second season has been building towards, and the other that has been hanging over the entire series to this point, I walked away from episode six disappointed. It is a rare thing for Continuum to misstep, but I feel like they have done so here. It wasn't bad, to use the word. It was just less. The dialogue seemed less authentic, the plot more procedural, the action more cliched. Which, presuming that it will be an important episode down the line, is really too bad.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that remember all their old bus routes.


It immediately stuck me how procedural the episode was. Considering that it is a show about a cop, who works with cops, the show wisely has never been a cop show. It avoid the Law & Order plots, but came at this one head on. And the potential was great: a serial killer whose case Kiera studied in the future, is active in the present, and using evidence from crimes that have yet to be committed, she tracks him down. It's a great plot, on paper. Unfortunately, in execution, it left me wanting. Aside from making suggestions based on no evidence, and alienating her further from Carlos, she didn't use much of any of her future knowledge to help solve the crime, and was mostly just in the right place at the right time. And, in the final act, less a homage and more a bland copy of the final sequence from Silence of the Lambs.

The episode never felt genuine, something the show has rarely had an issue with. The dialogue, especially between Alec and his lady friend, seemed stilted and cliched, over written and under acted, like rejected material from a romantic comedy. The manipulations from the new friend (whose name I either missed or wasn't mentioned) were obvious and transparent, and not at all up to snuff with some of the more subtle examples the show has already given us. And, considering that last week we got the far more effective and emotional reveal that Betty was a turn coat, that this new and unexplored character is also a mole for forces unknown comes off as an empty plot, and disappointing.

Considering that last week, everyone but Carlos was certain that Kiera was either a terrorist or a criminal, that she was making these huge, wild jumps in logic that turned out to be correct, and no one but Carlos seemed concerned about that, seemed disingenuous. The new captain, again, whose name escapes me, was gun-ho to take Kiera down, and suddenly evidence appears that suggests she's in league with a serial killer and doesn't act on it (Carlos straight up states that Kiera's knowledge could only come from someone involved in the crimes) made me wonder what the point of it all was. Each episode has done well to explore a core concept in relation to Kiera, but this episode seemed divorced from the entire concept of the series, and just used the characters as best it could. Even Kiera's out of no where assertion that she is worried about her changes to the timeline effecting her existence, is a concept the show already touched on, to greater effect, in season one, with her drug addicted grandmother.

It does raise an interesting question though: the only view of the future we have is from flashbacks to Kiera's past. We have not returned to the active future since the pilot. We, as viewers, experiencing the series through Kiera, have no idea what condition the future is in. Last week, Kiera was so hung up on thinking of the future chronologically (a year having passed since she came back, on her son's birthday, for both her and him) rather then thinking about time happening simultaneously (because he's in the future, her son is both non existent, being born, dying of old age and not existing again all at once). This week she gets hung up on the idea that, her making changes to the timeline might have wiped him, or even herself from history. Meaning that she is potentially the only version of her that could ever exist. The show, looking back, has made very few actual changes, and has not explored their repercussions at all yet. But Kellogg's grandmother was killed, essentially making him a walking, stable paradox. Kiera, having come to terms with never seeing her son again, is now obsessing over the notion that she herself might be a paradox.

As for the two big reveals, we got to meet the mysterious Mr. Escher, played by Hugh Dillon, and while his scene was brief, it also revealed nothing. He claimed to be willing to answer her (our) questions, but only gave her double talk and cagey, Yoda-like responses. Not giving away the farm is one thing, but being purposefully obtuse is another. I look forward to exploring his character more in future episodes, and hopefully filling in more blanks. It did (nearly) confirm that he is in fact a time traveller. Or at least, has knowledge of Kiera's temporal movements.

The second reveal, potentially the one to have the greatest effect on the series as a whole, is Kiera's confession to Carlos about who she really is, and where she comes from. I said, back at the start of the season, that Carlos would have to find out sooner rather then later, and a show like this tends not to save that sort of thing for the season finale. Sure enough, mid season, in a mediocre episode, comes the big reveal. And it was... underwhelming. I don't know what I was expecting, but her weeping on a torture chair while he stands over, pitying her, wasn't it.

Maybe I was hoping for something a little more protracted, like over the course of a couple episodes, his using his detective skills to put together the truth for himself (it's certainly been hinted at him enough times this season along for him to begin to suspect). Spoon feeding him the truth seems lazy, like they just wanted to get it out of the way, rather then work at it. Which so goes against everything this series has established about itself. It hasn't been afraid to work at concepts, to take time, to go the slow path. Just dashing this sort of thing out of the way like an annoying house cat seems like the tactic of lesser TV shows.

For the second week in a row, we had no Liber8 activity or appearances, though that stands to change next week, as Julian heads to court, and Kiera suspects something fishy.
Viewing all 1278 articles
Browse latest View live