Quantcast
Channel: The Disgruntled Individual
Viewing all 1278 articles
Browse latest View live

[Review] - Doctor Who, Series 7 Episode 11, "Journey To The Centre Of The TARDIS"

$
0
0

Well. That happened.

If the poster above had been in anyway indicative of the episode it was meant to represent, I'd say we might have been in for a good time. Sadly what we got was a mess of an episode which, despite having watched it multiple times now, I have no shame in admitting I'm still not entirely certain what it was about. Journey had the most promise of any episode this series, including the one scripted by Neil Gaiman, and is without a doubt the biggest disappointment, and possibly the unparallelled failure of the bunch. I didn't care for The Bells of St. John, but at least it was a muddle that held itself together. Journey ran itself round in circles, then collapsed on the floor, trying desperately to catch its breath. And never did.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that also once two days running through the same room, dressed as a strawberry.


I've been starting these reviews with examining the references to the series as a whole, and a break down of the episode it was meant to be undoing. However, if Moffat's intention was to wipe clean the memory of The Invasion of Time, you'll excuse me in sticking with the dodgy set pieces and potato-headed baddies. As slap dash as the sets might have been in that Tom Baker serial, at least there were set pieces. Exactly what is the point in devoting an episode of the series to exploring the TARDIS interior, and set 80% of said episode in the bloody console room? Fleeting glimpses and endless corridors is not exploration, it is fan wanking at its very worst.

I think the problem lies with the basic thesis of the episode: that there needs to be a special episode devoted to the TARDIS insides, a premise I disagree with heartily. The best looks inside the TARDIS we've gotten over the years have been those that are incidental. I take issue with the idea that the Doctor, living for more the 900 years in an "infinite" space, spends all his time in the console room. That'd be like owning Wayne Manor, and spending all the time in the breakfast nook. In the classic series, occasionally, the action would follow the Doctor (or more likely, his companions) as they walked the halls. The Fifth trying desperately to locate the Zero Room after his regeneration. Or the Tenth trying on outfits in the Wardrobe room, or Four and Adric visiting the Cloister room, or starring sadly into Romana's abandoned accommodations. It's never given us a full picture of the interior, but we can never know the arrangement and full capabilities of the TARDIS. To attempt to do so would be, well, probably something akin to what we got here.

I also don't understand why, if the show was intent on showing us specific rooms, why they wouldn't just go and do some location shooting. From a storytelling point of view, it seems like it would serve everyone better then having to wait until the budget would allow for a temporary set to be built, for use in one scene. And it's not as if there is a overarching architectural theme to the specific rooms. Need the library, find a university willing to sacrifice the periodical section for a couple days. Need a swimming pool, or an observatory, or garage, plenty of places like that out in the world.

I also take issue with the idea that, if a special episode must be devoted to it, why it has to be a one with a ticking clock and a finger on the trigger? It seems to me, the best way to do such an episode would be right after the acquisition of a new companion. The second episodes tend to be the Doctor showing the companion something amazing, and what would be more amazing then the labyrinthian corridors and endless wonders within the TARDIS herself. Stuff the exterior threat, and just have the companion get lost on the way to the bathroom. I'm certain the Doctor has enough secrets tucked away for a newbie to get themselves into a touch of trouble all on their own. All the addition of a baddie does is mean that instead of lingering and examining and exploring, everyone will spend their time running back and forth, and that Mr. Moffat is why the Invasion of Time lacked punch, not that the sets looked dodgy. It's because, much like this episode, no one stood still long enough for anything of any substance to happen. This episode could have taken place on any space station or alien colony or a giant hamster cage. Nothing, and I mean nothing, was uniquely TARDISy about it.

Nor, if you are making an episode set within the TARDIS, do you focus the emotional narrative on three wholly unlikeable characters we have no attachment to, and will be dispensed of in various ways. The fodder is not who we're invested in. Considering that two of the previous episodes have made such a deal about the TARDIS not liking Clara, would this not have been the perfect opportunity to build on that idea? The Doctor insists in this episode that it is important that they get along, so why wouldn't you build the episode around the TARDIS being petty and screwing with Clara, and having them work out their issues with each other? That is called character development. That is called good writing. This is a waste of an hour.

I've said it many times before, and I'll keep on saying it until someone listens, but simple stories are better. Insist on overcomplicating the story, and it will collapse in on itself, and take the characters along with it. Complexity should be built up gradually, over the course of an arc. And this episode is a perfect example of how not to write an episode of Doctor Who, so perfect that I will improve my opinion of Bells and Rings, which didn't bungle things as badly as this. There are salvage traders, which were a stupid way to precipitate the plot, and can I say how exactly little sense there was in how the story got started. The Doctor gets knocked out of, and under, the TARDIS, despite the doors being well and properly locked, while Clara gets dumped down several levels?

But anyway, so there was the magnetic blast thing, which caused the release of the terrible deadly gas, which is everywhere, except it isn't and is never mentioned again. Then there is the self destruct, which the Doctor does himself, because he need the salvage crew's help, which he doesn't. But it's not real, except it is, because... it says so in the script, I guess. Then also, there is a rip in time. Small one, so small it wasn't important to mention until half way through, but the rest of the plot pretty much relies on it, so should probably say something. Then the one salvage guy isn't an android, but the victim of the worst practical joke ever, but that doesn't matter because we don't care about him.Then there are the burnt future things, and I guess having your cells burn up at the molecule level not only somehow means you're kept reasonably whole, but also that you start acting like a wolf. But that's alright, because there is also the engines exploding, and going back in time and warning not to let the thing that just happened happen, and somehow a grenade reversing time even more, and the Doctor remembering that time reset, despite it being reset further back then even his future self had warned him about and oh no I've gone crosseyed.

Look, OK, this is your problem. And I don't know if Steve Thompson was just woefully ill equipped to write for Who, or if he felt he need to include every single story idea he developed when trying to break this story. Or if the mess is the result of some overzealous editorial control. But I want to know who to blame for this traffic accident of an episode, where everything was smashed together at high velocities and we got to watch them try to pry apart the wreckage. There was a genuine moment in the episode, at the end, in the quarry, when the Doctor confronted Clara. When he admitted everything he should have told her straight away because secrets never help, and she admitted she was frightened of him just then. Clara's shell-shock like reaction, and Smith's turn, from anger, to sadness, to father like joy was wonderful, , I just wish that a) it had happened in a better episode, and 2) that it hadn't been erased by plot contrivance #24601. Such a moment is deep and profound, and shouldn't be used as a cheap trick in an episode where nothing counts.

This episode had the potential to be that episode. The one episode a series that stands by itself, that shrugs off fifty years of programming and elevates itself to another level. It had the potential to be Blink, to be Midnight, to be The Doctor's Wife. Instead, it's now the episode of the series that fans (or, me at least) will pretend never happened, will skip over on the DVD, and is relegated to the shame-filled chuckles when we talk about the series low points. Congratulations Journey, you are the Ghost Light of the Eleventh era. Now, go to your room and think about what you did.

Oh, and can I just add how ridiculous the History of the Time War book was. The Doctor is the only survivor with enough details to write a book that thick, and he certainly wouldn't have included his real name in the text, nor would he have the patience to write such a volume, unless he did it during one of his depressive funks. Or why he would keep it on a pedestal in his library? There was a lot of everything about this episode that doesn't make any sense. I suppose we should be happy that, in universe, it never really happened.

Seeing A Movie This Summer?

$
0
0

Remember when the summer movie season started in July? I'm not the only one who remembers that, am I? I mean, when exactly did March become summer? Even April seems like pushing it to me. Despite Oblivion's release a couple weeks ago, the real summer season kicks off this week with the release of Iron Man 3, and May is as early as I'm willing to concede as being part of summer.

To celebrate the arrival of this, the most profitable of film seasons, here is a fantastically edited mash up of the trailers for films coming out between May and August. It is, in fact, better then some of the trailers for those films.

Via /Film.

Holy Poop Geysers

$
0
0

A second trailer for RED 2 has appeared, and details substantially more of the plot then the first, showing us exactly what Anthony Hopkins will be doing: being the bat-shit insane one this time, allowing John Malkovich to seem more reasonable by comparison. Director Dean Parisot's Galaxy Quest is one of the best parody films ever made, so I'm hoping that this sequel (which is sadly Karl Urban-less) will be a touch cleverer then the original, which was fun but lacked any sort of real edge past the first twenty minutes.

RED 2 is in theatres August 2. Those horribly photo shopped posters, which also appear in this trailer, are probably haunting your cinema lobbies right now.

Via First Showing.

[Review] - Continuum, Season 2 Episode 2, "Split Second"

$
0
0
[Author's Note: Due to a scheduling issue, the weekly review of Game of Thrones will appear on Wednesday this week. Next week, hopefully, things will return to their regular schedule.]

Courtesy of Reunion Pictures

Continuum isn't interested in absolutes. Last season, I suppose in the interest of introducing viewers to the world, and getting as many people on board as possible, it conformed somewhat to the white-and-black-hat mentality. But as the show progressed, it became more and more obvious that who and what was considered right was becoming increasingly complex. It came very much to a head in this most recent episode, which showed pretty clearly that in the world of Continuum, there is no obligation to dance with the one that brung ya.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that are actually a decoy.


First off, can I say how hilarious it is that Kellog has filled his yacht with models. The character is revelling in the extravagant vices of the modern era, and that using his wealth to go Entertainment 720 is well within the character. But as he was showing Alec around, and everywhere he turned there was a young woman draped across the furniture was just funny. Early on last season, I suspected Kellog would be one of the more interesting characters, and was glad when they used him sparingly. He was also the earliest example of what is quickly becoming the show's running theme, that loyalty only lasts until the better deal comes along. He shrugged off Liber8 so quickly, and I was worried towards the end of the season that he might be folded a little too closely into Kiera's crime fitting fold, but luckily, his selfishness has left him securely on the perimeter of the action.

I'm still not entirely certain what the plan is for Kiera, but maybe that is the point. Everyone else has clear goals and motivations, but Kiera just wants to get home, something she cannot reasonably achieve via any action. Secondary to that is stopping Liber8, and her waffling back and forth between acting as a vigilant and working with the police is the only point this season I'm not entirely sold on. If it were a concern over protecting her identity, then I would buy that, but her identity is secure (at least, from everyone but Gardner). Kiera is a decisive characters, and if not certain of an action, she at least never lets it show. My hope is that she doesn't collapse into a anxiety riddled mess, as the weight of her choices becomes more apparently. I was glad that the show, through Alec, pointed out a major plot issue from last year: Kiera wants to return home to her family, and thus cannot risk making any changes to the timeline. However, as the show has pretty much established that all of this has happened before, her attempts to stop Liber8 represent active attempts to change the timeline. That Kiera hasn't realised this until now may well be the beginning of a major shift in her character's direction.

I feel that the only way to reconcile these ideas is that all the little set backs are either a) pushing Liber8 towards the larger, more inescapable moments, like the terrorist attack in last season's finale, or 2) time is a little elastic, allowing for tiny deviations but ultimately making the fixed points in time immobile. The series has yet to explain the mechanics behind Kellog's grandmother being killed last season, and how that event was allowed to occur, and Kellog's existence has remained in tact, though I suspect its a result of Time Traveller's Insurance: the traveller in the past is immune to changes made in their native time. If Kellog were to return to 2077, he'd find he never existed in that timeline. If so, then Kellog becomes an even greater variable, able to become a part of whatever sequence of events he wishes, armed with the knowledge of how things played out originally, but unburdened by any sense of destiny.

Loyalty is a major, if not the major, theme of Continuum. Someone, presumably, is working for Liber8 from within the police service (smart money is on the techie Betty; major enough to have an emotional impact, minor enough not to upset the ebb and flow). Kiera and Gardner suspect each other, and if all the side switching is an indication, Gardner might end up being closer to correct by the season's end. At this point, the only 100% honest, 100% solid character is Carlos. As last season spent an entire episode proving, he has no temptation towards the dark side. He is the show's lone White Knight. And one of those is always good to have around, to seem immensely naive when compared to all the other sliding scales of morality.

This episode teased something that has been a long time coming, and I don't know how much longer they'll be able to maintain the charade: Carlos finding out the truth about Kiera. It seems like a big, season finale sort of thing, but on this show I can see it getting knocked off in a cold open mid season. And I'd be fine with that. What I don't have a read on is how Carlos will react. Which is good. It means the show is unpredictable, which means the writers are actually spending time thinking about things rather then just putting in the minimum amount of effort.

Liber8, which on the inside is far less organised and stable then the authorities know, has fractured yet again. With two divisions, each working towards similar goals, using different methods, and each intent of wiping each other out, is yet another bit of evidence to suggest that by season's end Kiera will have more in common with at least Sonya's (the ever capable Lexa Doig) crew. Kiera has already shown an willingness to work with Lucas, and I suspect as desperation grows so too will be the willingness to cast off certain moral reservations. Alec, it appears, is already there. And considering that last week he was so intent on not becoming the man who made all of this happen, this week he seems to have embraced the idea of at least becoming a man.

I started last week's review by saying that Continuum was a surprise last season. Now, it isn't. It has established itself as a show of quality, that isn't afraid to shake things up, to change directions, and to develop the characters into people rather then pieces. It is good TV. Even time travel, which most movies and shows use as either just a Macguffin (Doctor Who) to get the episode moving, or as the whole kit and kaboodle (Source Code). This show has managed to find that delicate balance that few can, where the time travel is an intrinsic part of the narrative, the effects of which move the action along without being the primary focus of the story.

The Small Council Should Include A Master Of Tongues

$
0
0


David J. Peterson has a job I would love: he invents languages. President and co-founder of the Language Creation Society, he is current language and culture consultant on the excellent Syfy series Defiance, and inventor of the spoken languages of Dothraki and Valyrian on Game of Thrones. While George R. R. Martin created those languages, his books rarely used more then a few words in a row. Peterson took those words, or phrases, and created a working language that could be spoken by actors, and understood by those willing to learn. And if you don't think in ten years there will a college somewhere offering Dothraki, then you underestimate geek appreciation. And to hammer home that point, I really should have written it in Klingon.

According to Peterson, who actually had to craft two versions of Valyrian (high and low, based on the real world Latin), the show has made only one major mistake in their use of his language guides. Says Peterson, "it should be 'KHAH-lay-see,' not 'ka-LEE-see.' The vowel change bugs me. The producers decided they liked the other way better. They probably thought most people were pronouncing it that way anyway, which is true."

I mentioned how impressed I was with Dan Hildebrand, who played slaver Kraznys in the first four episodes, how despite speaking an entirely fictional language (laced with profanities), he seemed like the most natural and less uptight cast member on the show. Peterson was impressed too, saying "He’s very convincing." And Peterson, as everyone else, was blown away by Emilia Clarke's bad ass boast at the end of episode four. And you can bet that scene wouldn't have been near as impressive if she was just talking nonsense rather then something with structure and reason behind it.

His work over on Defiance is impressive too, especially the Castithan that Jamie Murray and Tony Curran speak most regularly. Because of the smaller budget, tighter episode lengths, and longer assimilation between cultures, most dialogue is in English and the majority of the translations are one word swaps, like shtako in place of shit. Which is a common practise for sci-fi, which replaces every frakking bit of gorram dren with something more FCC friendly.

As I said, Peterson has an awesome job.

Via The Mary Sue.

They're Going To Need A Bigger Boat

$
0
0

The Wondercon trailer for Pacific Rim has been released, and gives us our first looks at Ron Perlman, Charlie Day, and the wide range of various monsters the robots will be fighting in the film. And I've got to say, as much as giant robots punching giant monsters in the face seems like a fun idea, I can't shake the feeling that this whole thing is going to be goofy. I have absolute faith in Guillermo del Toro, one of the few directors I do anymore, but Hellboy 2 got a bit goofy, and with all the CG and neon lights and I'm still not sold on Idris Elba's "rousing speech," and I worry. I'll still see it, I'll just gird myself before I do, and not expect as great a thing as I might have when the project was announced.

Maybe the movie will make this clear, but how exactly are they alien if they came from under the pacific? Wouldn't that just make them aquatic?

[Review] - Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Episode 5, "Kissed By Fire"

$
0
0
Courtesy of HBO
I think, at the season's half way mark, an argument can be made for season three being GoT's strongest to date, which is little surprise considering that the third book is the strongest in the novel series. The fragmentation is less jarring, the story beats flowing more smoothly, and no one seems to be getting the narrative shaft. Last week's episode was about big, loud, flashy event-type moments. This week was a step back from that, and allowed for some big, quiet, low-key but hugely important characters moments. Character moments that will, for good or ill, change the direction those characters were heading in, and in some instance change how the viewer relates to that character. And those are my favourite kind of episodes.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that know how to do other things with their mouths.


This week was all about decisions. And how, no matter good or bad, you have to live with those decisions. Many of these decisions also resulted in fundamental changes to the characters, or at least will given the chance. And everyone was getting in on the game.

The episode began where last week's left off, with The Hound and Beric taking part in the Trial by Combat. While this might seem like a hold over from last week's rough and tumble, it fit more naturally here, for two clear reasons. By offering the Hound a trial rather then just executing him, the Brotherhood wash their hands of making any sort of actual judgement. By leaving it up to the God of Fire, all they have to do is stand back and watch (and, die, in Bedric's case. Good thing he got better). There is a certain hypocrisy at work in their logic, where they claim to be serving Robert's justice, purging the land of those that do the most harm, yet put the Hound, arguably one of the most deserving of fiends, in a situation he is sure to escape from.

It's for the best, as the double punch of the Hound escaping and Gendry remaining with the Brotherhood, push Arya further over the edge towards completely emotional breakdown. Up until now, she's had someone to rely on: Ned, Yoren, Jaqen, Gendry. They provided support, both physical and emotional. And one by one they've either been taken away, or walked away. Losing people if tough, but having them leave you willingly if worse. Now, essentially, she is alone and without anyone who actually cares about her. To drive the point home, Thoros makes certain to tell her she's being ransomed off. Arya in the show has been slipping down this emotional slope for a while, and I expect her to crack any time now.

North of the Wall, John made two decisions, one to risk lying to his new Wildling cohorts (a decision he grapples with for far longer in the books, weighing the possibility of being found out and killed over risk to his Brothers back at the Wall), and giving into his desire for Ygritte. John, like Arya, hasn't been in many situations where he wasn't protected by someone, even if his life was always rather crap. But out in the wilds, without his Brothers to back him up, he's reevaluating what he believed to be his priorities. This episode has brought him the closest to Mance Rayder, in understanding what there might be for a person North of the Wall, and just how easy it is to take off his cloak.

The Karstarks made their decision straight away, and it backfired on them. By killing the Lannister children, it forced Robb into his difficult decision, and once again it is shown that Robb isn't that great of a King. His pride got the better of him here, and I think Cat and Edmure made the more reasonable argument. Better to keep the army, and lock the man away, rather then loose the army for the sake of his image. But Robb is his father's son and insisted on taking the noble, but ill advised route. Robb's story also reiterated that, as lousy as he may be as a King, as a General he's better then most, as his plan to take the unguarded Casterly Rock is an effective plan. Except, now he doesn't have the man power to do so, forcing him to the turn to the man he wronged. Which should end well.

I've never been partial to Stannis, as a character in either medium, but I warmed to him significantly this episode. His scenes, one with his crazy wife, and one with his daughter, were wonderfully done, and Stephen Dillane did a great job. He flinched, and grimaced, and showed a whole range of human emotions, which is important because usually on this show the characters only get to have one at a time. But Stannis came in all desperate and lonely and guilty, and was overcome by acceptance and more then a gravity boat of crazy. Keeping still born children in jars? Is that a sign of a balanced mind? And naming them? The night might be cold, and full of terrors, but inside is a crazy woman talking to formaldehyde sons. And then he pops over to his daughter's cage and acts both loving and distant and a little weirded out. It forced humanity out of Stannis, and it was refreshing to see. 

Davos got a touching scene, a marked improvement over the sterile and mathematical way the same elements were used in the books. His relationship with Shireen, considering he's lost his sons, was warm and honest and like Tywin and Arya last season, something I hope we see more of moving forward. That Davos chose to trust her with his secret, which admittedly wouldn't be that uncommon a thing amongst common folk, shows exactly who in Dragonstone he's willing to invest himself in. And an excellent introduction to the Greyscale.

But the night's honour is shared between two scenes. Jamie's confession, the pivotal character moment in the novels, was executed brilliantly, and should be run over to the Emmy offices straight away. The way Jamie sat, stagnate in the tub, none of his filth washing off of him, while he explained why be became the Kingslayer was a wonder to watch. And that the pain in his hand is little more then the physical manifestation of all the grief and hate that has built up in him over the years, attempted to be quelled with sex and bravado and forced out of him while exposed and at his wits end, I say the scene might have managed to surpass Martin's writing. It is for scenes like this that the show exists, and does itself proud.

Charles Dance is another reason the show should be proud of itself, and if I'm not too much mistaken, this episode featured the first standing of Tywin we've seen all season. Each of his other scenes have been him sitting, writing, plotting behind a desk. Here, his anger forces him to action, literally, to his feet. What an amazing scene that last one was, with three dynamic actors all feeding off each other. Lena Headey smirking the entire time until it got wiped off her face, Tyrion foregoing his usual banter in exchange for cold honesty, and Tywin, frustrated and having had enough with people not meeting his expectations. It was a hell of a punch, as the machinations of various characters over the last few episodes all came crashing down, and a great way to bring the episode to a close.

GTA 5 Promises Three Different Characters Players Can Kill Hookers With

$
0
0

Well, this "trilogy" of trailers for the upcoming Grand Theft Auto V pretty much hits all the spots that the series detractors make the most fuss over: random violence, sexual content, glorified depiction of gang lifestyles, rock and roll. It's all there. And all of that is pretty much why fans of the series are looking forward to the next installment.

It is a clever idea, making a personalised trailer for each of the three playable protagonists. Clever ideas are what I'm hoping for from GTAV, considering that GTVIII and Vice City practically invented and certainly popularised the sandbox gaming genre. However, since then, each game has been little more then an engineering tweak of the established format. The graphics have gotten better, the worlds more expansive, but  it all just seems like more of the same. And I know I haven't felt invested in any of the series characters since  Tommy Vercetti. Hopefully Michael, Trevor or Franklin will change that.

Hopefully.

ComicsAlliance Is Dead

$
0
0


Anyone who takes notice of where I cull stories from will have noticed ComicsAlliance mentioned more then once. It was a quality site. I say was, because as of Friday AOL has terminated the site. Some materials left over from last week were published Monday, but that was it. Chris Sim, contributor, reviewer and resident Batmanologist has a nice obituary for the site up now on his own little corner of the internet.

ComicsAlliance was part of my daily commute around the series of tubes, and it is sad to see anything as informative, well written and well maintained as it disappear. Under the editorships of Laura Hudson and Joe Hughes, CA brought unique stories and insight in a world increasingly over saturated with geek culture. And that they had writers like Chris Sim and Caleb Goellner certainly didn't hurt. Sim especially, with his constant Batman-analysis, and running series of reviews, were something to look forward. I will miss the site immensely, and wish all of its writers, contributors, employees and editors good luck in the future.

And AOL? For such a sudden and dick move, I have a personal message for you after the jump.



Via Comic Book Resources.

[Review] - Warehouse 13, Season 4 Episode 11, "The Living and the Dead"

$
0
0
Courtesy of Universal Cable Productions
Last season of Warehouse 13 (or, rather the first half of this season; I hate these .5 seasons) left me cold. It was decompressed to the point of frustration, had no idea how to balance the use of the characters it has thrust upon itself, and lacked any of the spark that had made the first two seasons so much fun. By the time its ten episodes had run their course, I had all but given up on the series, and was glad to see it disappear. Now it returns with a further ten episodes, and I'm giving the show one last chance (a decision that has made me not do weekly reviews of Defiance, a show that is really very good and that you should be watchng if you aren't already).

Historically, when SyFy starts breaking shows into .5 seasons, it is a sign that they are preparing to cancel the program (Battlestar, Eureka). I've heard no rumours about Warehouse 13's future, one way or the other, but the fact remains that these ten episodes will conclude it's fourth season, and SyFy scripted series rarely make it past that mark, going all the way back to Farscape. Which means, if these are to be the last (or near the last), they have a certain responsibility to make them as good as they can be, to go out on a high note (something Eureka really did not). And so, with the first episode of the season in the bag, I can say that the results thus far are... tepid. Which I supposed is something.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers whose subconscious takes the form of a hot dog cart.


This wasn't the best opening episode the show has ever done, which considering it was the followup to the worst finale they've ever done, isn't as bad by comparison. What I did like was that each team was conducting their own mission, independent of each other, but working towards solving their own case. A common complaint I had against last season was, with six regulars in the cast, and a steady stream of recurring guests, the shows rarely showed any ability to use them all to their best advantage. If they are going to keep using the case of the week format (a format that it should have grown out of by now), they need to construct the episodes so that, if everyone is involved in the action, they all have something to do. With the main cast now down to five, it shouldn't be that difficult: Artie at base, and team one and team two out in the field.

The show is aware of how obvious it can be sometimes, with Claudia's meta remarks about how Artie's subconscious takes the form of the warehouse. It wasn't a clever idea, but I've long given up on hoping for cleverness from this series, and hope at least for good. And it wasn't really that either, as the world of Artie's mind didn't really have any consistant rules governing it. It at least allowed for some cameos from some former guest stars, but mostly it was a missed opportunity. That exploring Artie's mind might have been a chance to reveal more about the man then has previously been alluded to, and that the manifestation of his fears, concerns and desires taking the form of former loved ones and objects within the warehouse could have been a way for him to process the guilt and grief he was feeling. That, in the wake of killing a close friend, his manifestation of MacPherson might have represented what Artie feared he has become? As is often the case, WH13 got right up to the edge of saying something profound, and fumbled it. It was, however, nice to see Roger Rees again, if only briefly.

My hope is that this isn't the end of Artie's emotional struggle with what he did, as this show has a tendency to wrap things up by episode's end and tuck them away as if they never happened. I hope that Leena's death has a lasting effect on the characters, and on their relationship with Artie. Within this episode, they all seemed far too willing to forgive him straight away, but simply claiming "it wasn't him" doesn't detract from the fact that it actually really was. He wasn't possessed, he wasn't replaced. It was Artie, just a dark version of him. He remembers doing it, he feels guilty about it and should, and the others should be understanding, yes, and supportive, yes, but not pretend like it never happened. I would like to see the show evolve into something with an emotional memory, and not just revert to default every time the credits role.

Elsewhere, I had to applaud the surprise appearance of James Marsters, who was not included on the announced list of this season's guest. And I am left to wonder how it is that he hasn't landed a starring gig on a show since Angel ended. Here, he steals the show away from every single other member of the cast, and I found myself hoping he'd join up, because every team needs a drunken immortal Englishman (I felt the same way about HG, but Jamie Murray jumped ship to a better show). They even got in a good jab at his most famous role, in what was probably the best line of the night. Happily, the epilogue scene, which also redeemed the apparently pointlessness of casting Polly Walker, established that he promises to be a lasting element this season. Suddenly, I've very curious as to how his character might connect to the end of season appearances of fellow Buffy alum Anthony Head.

The show has made a big deal of it's guest stars, and has racked up an impressive list of genre favourites. But I'm worried that they are relying too much on these stunt casting techniques. What promotion the show gets tends to be based on who is appearing in the next week, and not on the show itself. Which would be fine, if the guests were given material to work with. Marsters had a sizable role, but for Rees, Mulgrew, and Wagner it was barely worth showing up for. Last season, Brett Spiner was given probably the emptiest and thankless role the show has ever created. Viewers should be tuning in to see Pete and Myka bickering, rather then which former star of science fiction is playing the evil baddie or hapless victim each week. A show that can't sustain itself on its own merits isn't much of a show, and a show that relies entirely on the guests isn't a scripted drama, it's Hollywood Squares.

Finally, I'm not certain, but their use of the word "mortalities" in the countdown clock at the beginning of every segment should probably have been "fatalities." I could be wrong on that, but it bothered me every time it flashed up there, partly because arbitrary ticking clocks are among my least favourite cliches, and partly because I'm nearly positive they used the wrong word.

I could be wrong, but it still bothered me (which FYI is the motto on my family crest).

That's What I'm Talking About

$
0
0

Just the other day I was moaning about how none of the Star Trek Into Darkness posters released thus far had shown as of the originality or creativity of the poster for the first movie. And then this IMAX poster came along, and made me sort of shut up. It isn't as good, but for my money it's the best we've had for the sequel so far.

And there isn't that much time left for them to impress us.

Via /Film.

Someone Crawled Inside My Head, And Pulled This Movie Out

$
0
0


When it comes to dinosaur movies, I'm not looking for or expecting the level of quality that Jurassic Park gave us twenty years ago, though I should. I'm looking for accuracy, I'm looking for a sign that the filmmakers are interested in their subject matter, and I'm looking for the animals not to be constantly villainized as monsters. Mostly, what I'm looking for is respect for the dinosaurs.

I've long thought that the perfect dinosaur movie would be one set in the past, with no time travel or human interaction, following the animals in a narrative structure, but without a voice over narration (Planet Dinosaur) or the animals talking (Dinosaur). Just a straight up xenofictional account of the time and its inhabitants. And it is possible that Walking With Dinosaurs: The Movie is just that. If so then a) GET OUT OF MY HEAD, and 2) nice job.

The trailer leaves a lot of open questions about what the final product will be like, but on the surface I am excited. The CG looks very good, and I'm willing to over look the terrible trailer narration, the plot resemblances with Dinosaurs, and some obvious anthropomorphising because it looks so damned good, following (what appears to be) an infant Styracosaurus as he explores his time (75 million years ago, which would probably make the predators seen in the trailer Albertosaurus). What I can't overlook is the absence of features on the theropods, because we don't get to pick and choose which science we use. My hope is that the film will be voice over-less (seriously, that trailer narration is the worst), and that the animals will convey the story themselves, without help from any dulcet tones explaining every little action. Essentially, what I want is the first twenty minutes of Wall-E, but with dinosaurs instead of robots.

Is that too much to ask?

[List] - 12 More Pointless Marvel Casting Suggestions

$
0
0
Who could discover the Pym Particle?

I've done this before. A couple times. More then a few, actually (and once for the other guys). I like making wanton speculative statements. And the wonderful thing is, as the Marvel Cinematic Universe gets bigger and broader, the laws of statistics suggest eventually I'll get one of these right. And I'm willing to take that bet.

I came close, as I originally named Rebecca Hall as a valid choice for Scarlet Witch. She was soon after cast in Iron Man 3 as not Scarlet Witch. I was also right on the money on them using Falcon in the Cap sequel, I was just wrong about who they picked. And while I suggested Jason Momoa for Hawkman over in the Justice League, Marvel looked pretty closely at him for Guardians of the Galaxy. Looking back on my previous suggestions, I stand by all of them. Despite recent rumours that Marvel is looking elsewhere, I hold that David Duchovny would make a great choice for Doctor Strange, a film that Kevin Feige wants to make a part of Phase 3. And I maintain that either Joelle Carter or Charlize Theron would be equally good choices for Carol Danvers, though my heart belongs to Carter.

With the casting of Chris Pratt in Guardians of the Galaxy, Marvel has shown us they are more then willing to cast unexpected actors in their films. Feige is already looking into the next decade in terms of productions, so I feel like fans are well within their right to start taking wild guesses as to whom Marvel will latch onto for their next project.

Hit the jump to see the list.

Garret Dillahunt

Dillahunt is one of those guys that makes stuff better. He was great in the Sarah Conner Chronicles, he cuts it up on Raising Hope, he made Looper better in his scant few moments, and was a right fit on Deadwood. As soon as he appears on screen, it doesn't matter what he's doing, he makes it more enjoyable, and exudes talent. I have no role specifically in mind for Dillahunt, as he could well play anything. A SHIELD agent on the TV series, sure. Representative from an evil over-reaching corporation, easy. Multi-dimensional demon lord, why not? Plus he looks just slightly weird, which is muchly to his benefit. So go ahead Marvel, cast him in anything. Just don't waste him.


Valkyrie/Yvonne Strahovski


Amidst rumours that Natalie Portman was forced to appear in Thor 2 (contractual obligations most likely), it wouldn't surprise or disappoint me if her character failed to appear in the presumptive third film, thus allowing for the world of Thor to expand even more. The logical choice to replace Portman's Jane Foster as a love interest would be Valkyrie, a character so prominent in the Thor mythos I was surprised when they went with Sif in the first film (I'm not complaining, as I think Sif and the Warriors Three could sustain their own spin-off).

Strahovski more then proved her ability to kick ass on Chuck, and in the process endeared herself to geeks everywhere, so it wouldn't be a hard sell. She has yet to make her mark on the big screen, though a role in the upcoming I, Frankenstein hopes to change that. Her time on Dexter proves she can play the baddie too, which would help considering Valkyrie has a dark connection to the character I think would be the logical villain in Thor 3...

Amora the Enchantress/Ruth Wilson



I'm sorry, have you not seen Luther? Wilson brings the crazy. She brings it like a bottle of cheap wine to a fancy dress party thrown by someone she only barely gets on with, but understands there is an etiquette to this sort of thing. And she makes crazy enchanting. You can't peel you're eyes off her when she's on screen. So much so that Neil Cross and the BBC are considering a spin-off for her, just because she is so damned good. Everything Tom Hiddleston brought to Loki (who ideally should be nowhere near Thor 3), Wilson could bring to the exiled Asgardian sorceress. At least one of her origins has her being an apprentice of Loki's, which might provide some motivation if Loki goes bye-bye.

The Executioner/Vin Diesel


Any use of Amora would also require the use of her ever (to a fault) loyal Asgardian strong man. And such a role would require a very dominant physical presence, as well as an actor who could be able to play the emotional aspects as well. That is a short list. And I'll admit, I almost sided with Dwayne Johnson. Diesel wins out as he a better actor then the Rock (by whatever margins you wish to apply). Having carved out a career of playing anti-heroes, it is rare for Diesel to play an out and out villain. Plus he's a massive nerd, which does help sometimes with these sorts of roles. He would look well over Wilson's head, though not quite as much as her Luther co-star, and that dragged-over-gravel-at-the-bottom-of-a-deep-well voice clinches it for me. The most important thing would be that the Executioner should look like he could kick Thor's ass. And I think Diesel could pull that off (even though he's a couple inches shorter then Hemsworth).


Dagger/Alice Eve

Eve was nearly cast as Emma Frost in X-Men First Class, a role she lost to January Jones, who proceeded to "act" her way out of Days of Future's Past (no matter the low quality of the role, Eve would have at least been relied upon to emote like a human being rather then a sofa cushion). Eve is making her way up the Hollywood totem, and will next appear in J.J. Abram's Star Trek Into Darkness, undoubtedly her biggest role to date. Thing is, she's British, and she's funny, and talented, and then also mind swimmingly gorgeous. I would cast her in everything.

Cloak and Dagger are perhaps the most reliable secondary characters the Marvel universe has, appearing across all titles with regularity since their first appearance thirty years ago, but never sustaining their own title. More importantly, they were one of the properties (along with Black Panther and Iron Fist) which had treatments written for possible films after Disney's purchase of Marvel. Meaning, Feige might already be thinking about a way to use the pair later on down the line. Of course one does little good without the other, so...

Cloak/Keith David


In my mind, I'm envisioning Cloak being a completely digital character. Bryan Singer has teased that he's considering using a motion capture character in Days of Future's Past, and for some of Marvel's more extreme creations, it would be an easier path to take then trying to create costumes or make-up. So mo-cap Cloak, and use David to fill out the sort of deep, echoing voice that I've always imagined, to reflect the endless empty void that makes up Cloak's intangible self. And David is a master of that sort of voice.

Because their origin in the comics is a little wonky, and because their powers are a little more out there then what the MCU has dealt with thus far, it seems to me tying them to Doctor Strange in some way would be the easiest explanation. And since Feige wants to move forward on Strange...

Dormammu/Doug Jones


The plot description for Thor: The Dark World states that the Nine Realms will be threatened by "a mysterious enemy older than the universe itself." In the comics, Dormammu is often referred as one of the oldest, most powerful entities in the Universe, out pacing Galactus, Thanos, and all of the Asgardian mysticals. Thor already Easter-Egged Doctor Strange, and the Doctor is rumoured to be the post-credits focus of the Dark World, so the coming of Dormammu might not be as far off as you'd think (with Christopher Eccleston's Malekith the Accursed acting as his agent). Certainly, he's the logical choice for the primary adversary in a Strange film. His shape shifting and less then corporeal self might be an oppurtunity of Marvel to stretch more of it's motion capture muscles. And Jones is at the top of that particular field, having already visited a Marvel universe as the Silver Surfer. Plus, the lack of a physically defined antagonist adds to the irregular nature of the Strange lore.

Clea/Maggie Grace

During (or shortly after) her time on LOST, Grace was a fan favourite for the role of Kitty Pryde in X3, and I think everyone concerned is glad that didn't pan out. All these years later though, Grace deserves to have a role that does not consist solely of her screaming and being kidnapped (Taken, The Following). There was a brief flirtation in Taken 2 of showing her potential as a straight up action star (a position she also touched on in Lockout), and Marvel could make that happen. If Feige is serious about introducing the Lovecraftian world of Doctor Strange in Phase 3, Grace would be a fine choice for the Doctor's apprentice/love interest/demon spawn. And, she's already got proven chemistry with my favoured choice, Duchovny, having worked with him this past season on Californication.

Bonita Juarez, The Firebird/Genesis Rodriguez



If there is one group less well represented in the MCU then the female heroes, it is minorities in general. Outside of James "War Machine" Rhodes, Anthony Mackie's Falcon will be the highest profile non-white hero to appear, once The Winter Soldier arrives (Idris Elba as the race-lifted Heimdall appeared in Thor, of course, as did the Warrior Hogun, both in smaller roles, thus making Thor the most racial diverse of the MCU films yet). Marvel Comics Editor Axel Alonso agrees this is a problem, and has decreed that more Latino characters will be introduced into the comics, a move Kevin Feige would be smart to follow in the film.

Rodriguez, having made small appearances in Man on a Ledge and Identity Thief, seems to be one of those actress we'll be seeing increasingly in the near future, and Marvel would be smart to get in on the early days of that (as they did with Chris Hemsworth). Firebird, a Human Torch-style character with alien guff mixed into her origin, would also give them a chance to explore the larger influence of the Avengers on the world, as Firebird is most often found, when not part of the Avengers, leading the America south-west based Rangers. Which is also where Thor was set, so there could already be an established connection.

Brian Braddock aka Captain Britain/Nikolaj Coster-Waldau


With Joss Whedon's recent announcement that the Avengers 2 will contain a brother-sister team, I swept aside the suggestion of Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, and announced my favour for the equally possible, and far more interesting (in my mind anyway) duo of Brian and Betsy Braddock, the former of which is the Captain America counterpart, Captain Britain. As Marvel continues to grow in success and popularity, I'd like to see them start making smaller films, geared towards specific markets. The Marvel universe contains many characters and teams that originate from places that aren't New York, and with Alpha Squad in Canada, and MI:13 in the UK, there is enough material for them to stretch their international film making muscles a touch.

While Captain Britain has a more mystical origin in the 616 universe, in the Ultimate comics he was a product of the EU creating their own super soldier team via exo-suits and super soldier serum conditioning. The team eventually included Captains France, Italy and Spain, and all of whom would later die. I see the film version of Captain Britain being more about other countries fortifying themselves in the wake of the Battle of New York, and the return of the super soldier serum that created Rogers, and the Hulk. It creates a personal connection for those characters, and widens the rather American focused gaze the MCU has had thus far.

Coster-Waldau, who is fantastic as Jamie on Game of Thrones, and was sorely missed after sitting out most of last year, is becoming the cast member with the greatest potential for a blockbuster film career along side (and after) the series. He wasn't exactly hurting for roles before hand, having been working in English films since the turn of the millennium, and writing and producing in his native Denmark. He can do the accent, he looks the part, and wouldn't it be great to see Captain America, whose war time activities saw him working beside the British, standing shoulder to shoulder with Captain Britain against Thanos?

Betsy Braddock aka Psylocke/Alison Brie


Internet favourite Alison Brie was one of several actresses to try out for the role of Agent 13 in the upcoming Captain America: The Winter Solider, sadly loosing out to Emily VanCamp. However, as the recent casting of Lee Pace in Guardians proves, Marvel isn't beyond recognising talent when it appears in front of them, and finding a role for them elsewhere. And hopefully, this image will have been noticed by the right people, and convince them that there is a place in the MCU for Ms. Brie.

Some of you might be thinking, "but isn't Psylocke Asian?" which is sort of true. There is a whole telepathic body switch story that would have to be ignored anyway, as Braddock's 616 mutantness would have to be ignored altogether. Betsy began life as a Caucasian Brit, sister to Captain Britain Brian Braddock, accomplished pilot, model and eventual member of STRIKE, the British equivalent to SHIELD. In the Ultimate universe, her role was more assertive and less exploitative, introducing her as a Colonel in the British Secret Service. No matter what version she is, she's a master of sword and knife play, which would fit nicely into the niche left open between fist-and-gun master Black Widow, and Hawkeye's arrows.

And now some of you might be thinking, "isn't Brie American?" which is also true. And while there are many, many talented English actresses who would be good in the role, if you saw The Five Year Engagement, then you know that Alison Brie and her Emily Blunt impression were the best things about that movie. And Brie, whose current TV jobs will likely be gone within a year or so, should aim for movie star as her next career accomplishment. Marvel is as good a place to start as anywhere, just ask Chris Hemsworth.

Hank Pym aka the Original Ant-man/Steve Martin


This is my so-out-of-left-field-it-might-just-be-brilliant pick. Martin, many times over his career, has proven he can do drama, and so long as he isn't expected to act like a complete scene-chewing ham (cough.. Pink Panther...cough) he still one of the better comedic actors working. Like his contemporary Bill Murray, nowadays he is taking fewer projects, and choosing those projects with greater care, helping to elevate his career to yet another level even after all these years. And the man can play the banjo, so points for that.

Edgar Wright has made it clear that his Ant-man film, officially the first movie of Phase 3 of Marvel (and rumoured to be set up by Iron Man 3) will be multi-generational, taking place in the 1960's and in the modern day, following both the original Hank Pym and the current Stephen Lang. I can think of few off-the-wall but better choices to played the modern day Pym, the elder scientist whose adventuring days are behind him. Pair him with someone snarky like Nathan Fillion in the role of Lang, and Wright's obvious and abundant sense of humour, and you could have the makings of potentially the most accessible film in the MCU.

So there you go. 12 possible casting choices, each as likely to happen as my left foot falling off, sprouting lips and going on to have a successful career as a Broadway light-rigger.

This Is Just... Neat

$
0
0

There is, as far as I can tell, only one response to this fan made trailer for a Breaking Bad Lego video game. And it is thus:


Fox Promotes One Film, Remembers They're Making Another

$
0
0

Of all the various superhero teams, the Fantastic Four are my least favourite. I've never found them that interesting, as a group or individually. So I haven't been following the progress of Josh Trank's reboot of the franchise. Neither has Fox, apparently, who despite the film scheduled to start filming on June 17th of this year, has not yet announced a cast for the film. Maybe they're too busy watching Bryan Singer show everyone how to get interest up in a superhero franchise that should have died out long ago. Or maybe they were waiting for the release of Iron Man 3, so they could piggy back on the tenuously related Marvel film press wagon. Or maybe they are just lazy and don't actually care about the product. I'm guessing it's that last one.

In the last two days, two rumours have surfaced about the film. First, Girls' star Allison Williams (and daughter to the only American news anchor worth watching) is apparently the favourite to play Sue Storm, aka The Invisible Woman. The second was that Chronicle star Michael B. Jordan is favoured to play the role of Johnny Storm, aka the Human Torch. Concerning the latter, a source said the "chances depend on whether or not he has chemistry with the other actors up for the highly-anticipated movie, according to one insider."

I'm not going to comment on the fact that Jordon is black, and that historically Johnny Storm has not been. That, honestly, does not matter. That isn't an issue, or a story, no more then Samuel L. Jackson playing Nick Fury was, or Idris Elba playing Heimdall was. What I will say is that anyone classifying the Fantastic Four as "highly anticipated" clearly misunderstands both of those words. Avengers 2 is highly anticipated. X-Men Days of Futures Past is hotly looked out for. Fantastic Four is tattoo-after-a-night-of-heavy-drinking tolerated.

Meanwhile, in another universe, Kevin Feige has responded to the rumours about Avengers 2 including Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch with a definitive... no comment. Actually, what he said was, "I’m not confirming or denying. The draft could change six months from now." Which is true. The first draft of the Avengers included Wasp. Remember all the awesome stuff Wasp did in the Avengers. Like how she wasn't in it at all because Marvel told Joss he couldn't use her. So a brother-sister act might be in the draft (we have only Joss' word, and he might be screwing with us), and we have no idea who they are, or if they will last.

I've already backed my horse, and until there is an official casting and confirmation, and I see the actors in costume, I'm sticking with my theory. It uses all the same evidence everyone else's does, which is to say none at all.

Via Collider, and again, and The Mary Sue.

[Review] - Iron Man 3

$
0
0
Courtesy of Marvel
Iron Man 3 is an important film for Marvel, as important a film as the original Iron Man film, and last year's Avengers were. Iron Man was about proving that Marvel's plan would work, and establishing a formula for moving forward. Avengers was about proving that you could bring all of these characters together into a film, and have it be an actual film and not just a congested mess. Iron Man 3 is about proving that Marvel, with all their success, can shirk off the established formula and move into a new avenue. It's about making a statement, that Phase 2 isn't going to be your standard experience. And that the heady days of origin stories are well behind us.

Marvel's Cinematic Universe made superhero movies not only popular, and successful, but also proved that they didn't have to be morose affairs to be good. Phase 2 is a distinct move away from making superhero movies. Iron Man 3 establishes that pretty early on. "Superhero Movies" is a phrase we need to stop using. Because, like cartoons, they aren't a genre to themselves, not any more. Marvel is interested in making movies that happen to be about superheroes. And if Iron Man 3 is any indication, only barely at that.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that once ruined scenes filmed exclusively for the Chinese market.


It is easy to see why Marvel went with Shane Black for IM3. Jon Favreau had gotten too bogged down in the superhero-lore of the universe, though via edict from the powers that be. And in an effort to go hard in the other direction, they picked the best man for the job: how to make a movie about a guy who wears a super suit, that isn't about a guy wearing a super suit. It isn't even a deconstruction of the idea, as Whedon touched on in Avengers. It's just a lateral move. What happens when you take this guy out of the suit? What does he become then? From a story arc perspective, it makes sense. The first film was getting him in the suit, the second was about him trying to find a balance between the two, and this one was about him getting out. And he does, spending most of the film non armoured. And even when the suit is active, Tony himself is rarely inside of it.

Making the suit partially autonomous is the first in a series of developments that emerge early in the film that set the road for what is to come. Right from the first film, Tony has claimed that he is Iron Man, and this film finally tackles the question of, if that is true, who is Tony Stark? It also follows through on several plot threads established in the Avengers, that either would have been skipped over entirely, or glossed over in haphazard way if Avengers 2 had been the immediate follow up (another reason why DC's shared universe won't work, if all they intend to make are Justice League films). It is exactly the sequel that was needed to last year's blockbuster, while remaining separate and isolated from it. Tony is the only Avenger who isn't a trained solider, or has combat experience. It stands to reason that he would be the one whose response to the Battle of New York would be the most traumatic.

But this is an Iron Man film, which means the focus needs to be on Tony, not on the larger universe. Which is why repeated requests to Tony to talk about New York throughout the film go unanswered. Which is why this is the most self contained film the MCU has produced to date, with barely any references to the larger goings on (though SHIELD and "the guy with the hammer" get name checked). Considering how cluttered IM2 became with trying to fit everything, IM3 feels relaxed by comparison. Like things have the opportunity to play out. Not that it is a slow film by any stretch. At just over two hours, Black has thrown a lot of noodles at this particular wall, and some of it sticks. Some of it, however, falls limp to the floor, to get brushed under the cupboards and attract ants.

At it's core though, this is a detective story, and there is a sequence where Tony raids a hardware store and invades an enemy strong hold where I realised that Black might be an interesting choice to helm the next Batman film. Because Tony did more sleuthing and detectiving in this film, with a kid side-kick, then Batman did in all the Batman movies released ever. Spiritually, it is as much a sequel to Black's superb Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (the movie that got Robert Downey Jr. the role of Iron Man to begin with) then it is to anything within the MCU. In tone and irreverence, it has all the beats of Black's best stuff, from the Christmas setting to the largely comedic dialogue, the emotional underpinning, and the extreme shift towards violence in the third act.

The precipitating moment in Tony's involvement with the Mandarin, played wonderfully by Sir Ben Kingsley, is a terrorist attack in LA that leaves Happy (Favreau, in a role slightly expanded because he's not having to be behind the camera) in hospital, and Tony's already frayed nerves exposed. He makes an unwise and emotional move, which results in his home being destroyed, and his loved ones scattered. He finds himself alone, without a suit, or resources, or friends, having to track down and stop a terrorist before he concludes his sinister plot. And that is when the movie is at it's best, when Tony, long heralded as the smartest guy in the room, has to figure out how to work with nothing, and get the job done.

There is a lot at play here, and many subplots get pushed to the side in favour of the stronger lead story. Poor Don Cheadle gets nothing to do, and once the explosive finale ramps up, he disappears entirely. Rebecca Hall is wasted as the precipitating event in everything, a character whose scenes are the film's weakest, and whose motivations aren't ever exactly clear. In fact, no ones motivations are ever made clear. Say what you will about IM2, but at least you understood what Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell were after. The villain's big reveal is impressive, and literally the strongest villain of the three films, but aside from general chaos, and a health touch of spite, you never understand why he's doing the things he's doing.

But where some story elements leave you wanting, others surprise you with their strength. Black managed to make Jarvis an actual character rather then just an exposition machine, and not even Whedon could work that. And the subplot with the kid, which I was worried would come off too Short Round, turned out to be one of the better relationships in the film. It was terse, honest, and believable. The dramatic alteration to the character of the Mandarin works far better then you'd expect it to, and Guy Pierce, coming off the sour taste in your mouth that was Prometheus, finally gets a role he can sink his teeth into (and appear for more then ten minutes in).

From here on out, I'll be talking about the end of the film, the post credits sequence, and the future. So if you'd rather skip that, I suggest you get off here, OK?

I spent the entire movie disappointed with Black and Downey over their treatment of Pepper. Yes, she does in fact suit up, for all of about thirty seconds. Long enough to tease, not enough to satisfy. She spends the rest of the film being kidnapped, and experimented on, and having to be rescued. She's more a damsel in this film then she ever was in the other two. A completely underwritten, cliched, and disappointing turn for the character. Until she becomes the MCU equivalent to She-Hulk and saves not only Tony, and herself, but also the day. It was a risky misdirection, one that could alienate the increasing number of fans who want to see the female heroes get more focus. But it was a hell of a pay off.

The ending though, felt rushed. Pretty much everything from the time the fleet of suits shows up straight through to the credits (which were Grindhouse inspired, and a great way to cap the series) felt like it was mandated developments, as many of the changes come suddenly, with no build up, and brushed aside by the narration. True, Tony Stark tends to work on impulse, from his first film declaration, to his calling the Mandarin out here, but the fact that absolutely everything changes within five minutes, bringing the series to a full conclusion, seemed abrupt, running counter to the tone and pace of the rest of the film.

I respect Marvel for showing the restraint they did, in divorcing this film from the larger MCU. Phase 1 was so concerned with seeding and linking that you were expecting Easter eggs to crop up (and come to a boiling point in IM2). And you can see where the pieces could have fit. The kid could have easily been Rick Jones, the gifted surgeon to rids Tony of his shrapnel could have been Steven Strange, the Extremis device a gateway to Super Solider 2.0 or other developments. Save for the post credits sequence, the film proves that these stories can stand on their own, as well as be a piece to a larger puzzle, which was pretty much the charm of the original Iron Man.

The final reveal though, that Tony has given up on his armour, that he no longer needs his chest-mounted arc reactor, that he is moving on with his life is a huge development for the MCU. But it also makes sense. This is the end of the story of Iron Man, but as the credits promise in a Bond-esque way, Tony Stark will return. It took him four films and a lot of physical and emotional damage to realise that the thing that came out of that cave back at the start, wasn't who he really was. I don't doubt we'll see Tony pop up in Avengers 2, but I doubt, or I hope, we'll never see Iron Man again. His place on the Avengers can be filled by the Iron Patriot, if they need a power suit on the team. And I hope that Marvel sticks to its convictions, and that despite all the money IM3 has made, that IM4 never happens. This story is over, now is the time to focus on new stories, and new heroes. Bruce Banner's appearance in the post-credits confirms that Tony is still a part of this world, but that it is time for new characters to take over (it also marks the first time the same actor has played Bruce Banner twice, so yay Ruffalo).


Iron Man 3 is a completely different beast to the first two films, but that was entirely the point. It's hard to compare the three together. What is clear is that IM3 is the funniest, cleverest, most ambitious of the three. And it is certainly more successful at being bold then the second film. What it wasn't was the movie I was expecting, and that is the best thing that can be said about it. It defies expectation, and if this is how Phase 2 is shaping up, then I can't wait to see how the others turn out. November can't get here fast enough.

[Review] - Doctor Who, Series 7 Episode 12, "The Crimson Horror"

$
0
0

I don't know how I feel about The Crimson Horror. I've watched it, and come out the other end completely feelingless. It wasn't a strong episode, but it wasn't the weakest this season has give us. There was a lot going on, and it felt very rushed at times, but it also had some strong character moments. I suspect this will be the sort of episode that grows on me, and that repeated viewings will endear it to me more, but as of right now I'm ambivalent. Hooray, I guess?

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that once also ended up in Yorkshire when trying to get to London.


First, to the references, and maybe I was just tired, but not as many as I expected. The obvious one was the Doctor's summing up of his relationship with Fourth and Fifth Doctor companion Tegan, the "gobby Australian." Beyond that, I either missed them, or writer Mark Gatiss wasn't overly concerned with the larger picture here. I can't even think of an episode this one was "fixing," thus making it the combo breaker for this portion of the series.

Can I say, Mr. Sweet is perhaps the most disgusting thing the series has ever created? That leech gave me more of a wiggins then anything else they've created, which just goes to show you, if you try to make something frightening, chances are it won't be. But put a gnarly looking puppet on a distinguished actress's chest, and I won't be able to sleep.

So, I've said before that Vastra and co. are deserving of their own spin off, as have everybody else. They are as transparent as Moffat has ever been in creating characters meant to be hugely popular. However, past their initial appearance, they've run into the problem of never having much to do when they appear. When last they showed up, I suggested they might do better in a web series, five minutes a piece, and played for laughs, as that has been where they've been used the best. I was hoping this episode, the first they've appeared in not written by the creator Moffat and establishing them as recurring characters and not just a writer's fancy (like River Song, for instance), would dissuade me from this opinion. Sadly, it did not.

Vastra and Strax took a back seat to Jenny, and the episode was at its strongest when it was Jenny investigating the mysterious Sweetville, the unknown threat looming around every corner. The atmosphere was well built up in those first fifteen Doctorless minutes, from the crazed rambling of Mrs. Gillyflower, to the empty room with phonographs blasting machinery noises, to the Frankenstein-style monster being kept chained upstairs. It was when the Doctor did arrive, and we got an exposition blast, filling in an episodes worth of his own poking about, that things took on their usual, more manic form.

There was some good strong characterisation here, especially when it came to Ada, who starts the episode a lost victim, and ends it brave and independent. Her and the Doctor's short yet deep relationship only really calls to attention the lack of such depth the Doctor has with Clara. At least Amy and Rose and Donna had an emotional connection to the Doctor, and he to them. Because the show seems intent on keeping all the big reveals tucked away for the final episode, Clara comes off as little more then the Doctor's pet. Considering last week's regrettable turning back of the clock, this week was another lost opportunity, as it featured characters who not only knew the Victorian Clara, but saw her die. Despite this, once the Doctor says "shh," they never bring it up. Not even Strax, who has no censor between his potato shaped head and his mouth. A perfect opportunity to actually investigate Clara's nature, and they didn't.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if the Silurians are going to keep being used, and the writers are going to keep referring to the prehistoric past, there needs to be some kind of actual timeline established for when the Silurians roamed the Earth. The time that makes the most sense, and was the third Doctor's opinion, was the Eocean period, 56 million years ago. This episode had the Red leech coming from anywhere from the pre-dinosaur era, to the Jurassic. It doesn't take much more the a cursory Google search to figure out that these times are millions of years apart, and it would be nice to maintain at least an illusion that a show about time travel might understand how long time is. As much as one might expect a show about space travel to understand that people standing around a launching rocket will be evaporated by the blast, even if they are on the stairs with their backs turned.

Next week though, we get Gaiman, and a bunch of Cybermen that look to have been designed by Tony Stark.

What Kind Of Park Is This?

$
0
0

That is the image sent out by Jurassic Park 4 director Colin Trevorrow, who is currently scouting filming locations in Hawaii. The caption accompanying this image? "Nublar."


OK, so clearly the writers have done something wise with Jurassic Park 4, if this tweet is to be believed, as it implies that the film will be returning to the actual Jurassic Park, and Isla Nublar, the location of the original film. In any thoughts I might have had myself about how to continue the story (and I did break one version of the story that I thought worked really well, and will never go into detail about here because I intend on using it elsewhere one day), all of them concerned returning to the site of the original park.

So... early days. I'm still bummed about the feathers. But pick the right animal to headline, and put us in the right spot, and maybe (maybe) JP4 will be worth getting excited over.

Maybe.

Via Den of Geek.

[Review] - Game Of Thrones, Season 3 Episode 6, "The Climb"

$
0
0
Courtesy of HBO

"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention."

Just the other day, some GoT fans and I were discussing which of the series (either book or film) motto's bests works as a descriptor of the series as a whole. "You win or you die," was a favourite, and yes, obviously. I'm rather partial to "the night is dark and full of terrors," and equal considering was given to "anyone can die." But I nominate the above quote, said with delicious aplomb by Iwan Rheon, who hasn't had much to do in the Dany-fied storyline Theon has been stuck in, essentially a stop gap plot meant to keep him on the show between last season and next (or more reasonably, season five). 

Elsewhere, I've seen this episode, the first on the down hill stretch of season three (the first half of the season are about setting the stage, getting the players in place. The second half is about pushing the boulder at the stage, and watching everyone run of their lives), called the weakest of the season. I disagree. Episodes like this are the reason I watch the show to begin with. I'm not invested in Game of Thrones as an action series, I'm not expecting fireballs and sword fights every week, and I'd be disappointed if there were. I'm in it for the politics, the machinations of the characters, and the intrigue. Anyone calling this episode weak surely doesn't recognise that as much happened in this episode as happened in any of the action heavy episodes. The battles were just fought with words.

Hit the jump for the review, which contains spoilers that cuts their meat with their elbows.

What I most enjoyed about this episode was the delicate patience it displayed. It allowed, as last week did, for scenes to unfold, without unnecessary fragmenting. The triumph, from an editing perspective, was the Brotherhood scenes. In earlier seasons, or in other episodes, that story might have been crux of the entire episode, with a cut when Melisandre arrives at camp, and another after Thoros' speech, breaking the section into three. Instead, we got a solid chunk devoted to learning everything we need to about these characters, and finally Melisandre has the chance to reveal her true self. In the books, at first at least, she is limited to interacting with Stannis, who is devoted to her, and Davos, who hates her. In that situation, she is in control, she holds the power. It is a welcome deviation from the source material to put her up against Thoros.

They are opposing sides of the coin, and that was the real thrust of the episode: opposition. Melisandre, devout in her allegiance to R'hllor, 100% behind the cause and has absolute faith in Stannis. And Thoros, an admitted atheist, a drunk and a braggart who gave up his solemn duty to chase whores and fight in tourneys. And yet, he is the one with the power, that the Lord of Light has seen fit to bless with magics, while Melisandre is forced to resort to shadow tricks and fire gazing. You can sense the seething envy coming off her as she molly grubs Beric's wounds.

Tyrion and Cersei formed an uneasy alliance in their shared misery after the revelations of last week, and Tyrion discovered that it may well have been Joffery, not Cersei, that ordered his death on the Blackwater. Whether this is true or not comes down to how much you trust Cersei, to which I feel the sane answer is "not at all," but she has made the substantial point this season of telling everyone that she can no longer control her son. Why then, if he did order the hit, protect him any longer? Either answer, she or him, works, and both build towards future events. It was an odd scene, considering the usual level of animosity between the characters, with Cersei even admitting and nearly thanking Tyrion for his efforts as Hand, something he has craved from every quarter and never expected to receive, least of all from her.

I wondered at the start of the season exactly how much Diana Rigg would get to do in the role of Olenna, considering the character has all of two scenes in the novel. The answer is, give her a scene a week with the other characters, gradually moving her up the power chain of King's Landing. From Sansa to Cersei, to Tryion and Varys, and now finally to the Hand's chambers and an audience with Tywin himself. Another set of opposing forces, perhaps the two people who have played the game of thrones better then anyone else, if only because they've managed to live longer then people usually do in this world. Tywin, who keeps things close to the chest, and Olenna, who says exactly what she's thinking. While Tywin favours skirting subjects, Olenna goes for the graphic metaphor. While Tywin vales his intentions with threats and posturing, Olenna calls him out, forces him to action.

The weak points of the episode were few, and restricted to the subject of the Wall. Jon and the wildlings climb, while Sam and Gilly admire his obsidian blade. And the Reeds continue to be useless (personal bias: I hate them), though setting up Osha and Myra as opposing forces, each only desperate to protect those they've sworn to, was a nice touch. Not that it will pay off, because nothing does where the Reed children are concerned. Sansa's scenes were partly filler too, if only because it just added more evidence to the already made case that Sansa is still a child grasping at fairy tales. And we already knew that she and Shea were a refelction of each other, one niave and innocent, the other jaded and aware.

The episode ended with my favourite dichotomy, Varys and Littlefinger, and for once Littlefinger came out on top. We also got yet another metaphor for power, which has been called a shadow, knowledge, power, and now a ladder. Littlefinger manages to destroy Varys, if only briefly, and the irregular look of defeat on Varys' face was heartbreaking, especially as the viewer tried to figure out if Littlefinger was bluffing and trying to get Varys to reveal something, or if he actually had bested the Spider in his game. And then the slow realisation that Littlefinger is telling the truth, and that poor Ros has come to a terrible end. And then we got to see that end. For a wholly original character, she lasted a lot longer then anyone expected, and I'm sad to see her go. But it gave us our final opposing pair of the evening, Joffery having made the perfect shots that Arya was practising at the beginning. And the vision of eyes that will be snuffed out as Arya continues to lose herself in the darkness.

"If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention."

Nathan Fillion Headlines The New Ottawa Comiccon Lineup

$
0
0


Earlier in the year, I reported an impressive lineup for the second annual Ottawa Comiccon, being held this coming weekend, May 10-12, in Ottawa Ontario. Since I reported this, there have been several additions, and several drop out, resulting in some last minute but hugely exciting announcements concerning the event.

Alongside the already announced Gillian Anderson, Felicia Day, Wil Wheaton, James Marsters, Nicholas Brendon, Burt Ward, Billy Dee Williams, Summer Glau, Jewel Staite, Kevin Sorbo will be original Catwoman Julie Newmar, SG-1's Daniel Jackson Michael Shanks, Sparticus' Manu Bennett, and Reading Rainbow and TNG star LeVar Burton.

No longer appearing are Adam West, Jonathan Frakes, Laurie Holden, or Danai Gurira. To make up for these losses, the organisers have outdone themselves in procuring Nathan Fillion, star of Castle and Firefly. Also in attendance will be the Batman '66 Batmobile, For a complete list of guests, including several impressive additions to the artists and comic creators, check out the official site, which also includes the schedule for the weekend.

In an improvement over last year's inaugural event, Q&A's and photo opts are being offered in themes, with a Firefly Panel occurring on Saturday, and various Trek, Wars, Buffy, and geek themed groupings finding their way onto the schedule. There also appears to be a bit more balance between use of the main hall and the other rooms. However, given the size of the space available, and the increasing size of the event, I wonder if next year they might have to look for a new location.

I will be there on both Saturday and Sunday, not in any official capacity of course, but as a fan, wandering the market or waiting patiently in line for autographs. I'll be the bearded fellow in the hat. If you happen to be in the National Capital region this weekend, why not stop by and see if there is any parking left? I doubt there will be.

Via Ottawa Comiccon.
Viewing all 1278 articles
Browse latest View live